Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Iron Poles, Wooden Poles

The Electric Telegraph and the Ottoman–Iranian Boundary Conflict, 1863–1865

Bibliographic Data

ID12533772
AuthorsSoli Shahvar (0000-0002-3647-4668, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume34
Issue1
Pages23-42
Publication date2007-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Middle Eastern Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1353-0194 • E-ISSN: 1469-3542
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13530190701224090
OpenAlexW2046102192
LanguageEN
Citations received4

In spite of a series of negotiations and treaties since 1639, the border between Iran and the Ottoman Empire, in mid nineteenth century, was not yet completely settled nor was it delimitated. Under the terms of the Second Treaty of Erzurum (1847), both sides agreed to maintain the status quo pending further agreements.' This situation posed a serious problem for the British government, who, at the beginning of the 1860s, wished to connect London and Calcutta by electric telegraph through Ottoman and Iranian territories. By that time European and Indian telegraphic expansion, moving towards each other, had reached Baghdad and Karachi, respectively. In order to bridge the remaining gap, the British government entered into negotiations with its Iranian counterpart, for a land-line from Baghdad to Karachi through Iranian territory and along the Makran Coast. Only in 1863, and after almost three years of quite tough negotiations, did the Iranian government agree to allow its construction. But the British government soon learned that they would have to confront one of the longest and most complicated disputes, namely the border dispute between the Ottoman Empire and Iran, in order to complete the desired Indo European telegraph line (IETL); for it had to be specifically determined at exactly which point the telegraph line stopped to be Ottoman and began to be Iranian and vice versa, and this seemed to be impossible if the border was not delimitated. The Anglo-Iranian telegraph convention of 6th February 1863 called for the construction of an overland telegraph line from Baghdad to the Persian Gulf through Iranian territory. This line was to be constructed 'without delay' by the British government on behalf of its Iranian counterpart, while the Iranian authorities committed to 'assist in the work of construction by supplying such materials as were locally available'.2

Ancient history · Boundary (topology · Political science · History · Islamic Studies and History · Mathematics · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Turkey's Politics and Society · Geology

  • “A Most Powerful Instrument for a Despot”

    E Thomas Ewing•Nation State and Beyond•2013

  • From Enemies to Friends with No Benefits

    Open Access•Serpil Atamaz•Iranian Studies•2021

  • All Rulers are Brothers”

    Open Access•Moritz Deutschmann•Iranian Studies•2013

  • Neoliberalism’s antecedent histories and the colonial conjunctures of media and communication

    Sanjay Asthana•Third World Quarterly•2025

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,31
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae