The Anglo-Iranian oil crisis revisited

The 1953 coup in Iran was not inevitable. It would not have happened if at least two opportunities had been seized to settle the Anglo-Iranian oil dispute. The first was the World Bank proposal of February 1952 to act as a neutral intermediary between the two sides by running Iran’s oil industry for 2 years on a non-profit basis. It was accepted by Britain but rejected by Iran, because it insisted on the Bank acting solely on its behalf, a condition which would have compromised the Bank’s neutrality, and would not have been accepted by Britain. Deprived of its oil revenues, Iran ended up printing money, which eventually led to the dissolution of the parliament, playing right into the hands of the coup makers. The second opportunity arose a year later when Britain and America proposed to refer the case to the International Court’s arbitration. Iran rejected this proposal as well, leaving the two Western powers to implement their coup a few months later

Arbitration · Economic history · Economics · Economy · Intervention (counseling · Neutrality · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Profit (economics · Revenue · Law · Natural Resources and Economic Development · Finance