Kadima goes back
The limited power of vagueness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12540503 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Giora Goldberg (Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-50 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Israel Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1353-7121 • E-ISSN: 1743-9086 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13537120903461979 |
| OpenAlex | W1981904942 |
| Language | EN |
Kadima lost the 2009 elections to the Likud after it had come to power in the 2006 elections. While Kadima only lost one seat (28 instead of 29), and even remained the largest party in the Knesset, it had no chance of remaining in power. Kadima is the most important phenomenon in the Israeli party system in recent years. Despite the fact that it did not win the 2009 elections its influence on the political system has been enormous. After its victory in 2006 Labour and Likud tried to copy it, as happens with every successful product. The best way to relate to Kadima is as a completely different phenomenon, in terms of the standard tools of the historical party map and the traditional division into blocs. This approach denies the former five conceptions of Kadima: a classic centre party, a neo-centrist party, a centrist party in the left bloc, a faction in the Likud or a middle party
Epistemology · Knesset · Phenomenon · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Vagueness · Victory · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Middle East Politics and Society · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|