Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gender analysis of family planning

Beyond the feminist vs. population control debate

Bibliographic Data

ID12547306
AuthorsInes Smyth (corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume2
Issue2
Pages63-86
Publication date1996-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueFeminist Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-5701 • E-ISSN: 1466-4372
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13545709610001707656
OpenAlexW2041177836
LanguageEN
Citations received13

This paper tries to assess whether the recent adoption by population establishment agencies of feminist language and concerns also embodies feminist visions and values, or whether it hides fundamental differences. In particular, the paper warns that this adoption may simply be an expression of the kind of instrumentalism common to many development policies which are recommended for the benefit of women.For this purpose, the paper describes the historical context of the apparent changes in the treatment of women by the population establishment. It then analyses feminist notions of reproduction, science and reproductive technologies, and how these inform critiques of family planning programs. Since such critiques are not uniform, in content or degree, this analysis includes the different feminist traditions from which they derive

Biology · Context (archaeology · Control (management · Economic growth · Economics · Epistemology · Family planning · Geography · Instrumentalism · Management · Political science · Population · Population control · Reproduction · Research methodology · Social science · Sociology · Vision · Anthropology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Gender Studies · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Reproductive Justice and the History of Prenatal Supplementation

    Meredith W Reiches, Meredith Reiches•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2019

  • Global Reproductive Justice

    Rishita Nandagiri, Leigh Senderowicz et al.•Feminist Economics•2025

  • What Reproductive Justice Brings to and Requires of The Feminist Economics Project

    Open Access•Contributors: Contributors, Wendy Sigle et al.•Feminist Economics•2025

  • The Intersections of Women’s Economic and Reproductive Empowerment

    Sarah Gammage, Shareen Joshi et al.•Feminist Economics•2019

  • Neo-liberal Development and Reproductive Health in India

    Open Access•Rachel Simon-Kumar•Indian Journal of Gender Studies•2007

  • Population Control and Eugenics

    Open Access•Daksha Parmar, Mohan Rao•Indian Journal of Gender Studies•2023

  • Are UNDP Indices Appropriate to Capture Gender Inequalities in Europe

    Open Access•I Permanyer•Social Indicators Research•2011

  • Evolution and involution in the sexual and reproductive health services in Catalonia (Spain)

    Open Access•Barbara Biglia, Maria Olivella-Quintana•Women s Studies International Forum•2014

  • Traditional” women, “modern” water

    Open Access•Kathleen O’reilly•Geoforum•2006

  • Population policies and education

    Catherine Bovill, Margaret Leppard•Globalisation Societies and…•2006

  • Introduction

    Ellie Perkins, Edith Kuiper et al.•Feminist Economics•2005

  • The Measurement of Multidimensional Gender Inequality

    Open Access•I Permanyer•Social Indicators Research•2010

  • What's so troubling about 'voluntary' family planning anyway? A feminist perspective

    Open Access•Rishita Nandagiri•Population Studies•2021

Citations per year0.62
Citation span2005 - 2025 (21)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae