Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Argumentative Steps in the Halakhic Give-and-Take Conversations in the Mishnah and Tosefta

A Method to Measure the Degree of Aggressiveness in the Conversations

Bibliographic Data

ID12562216
AuthorsRivka Shemesh-Raiskin (0000-0003-4105-4382, Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume31
Issue2
Pages219-242
Publication date2020-12-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the Royal Asiatic Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-1863 • E-ISSN: 1474-0591
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1356186320000620
OpenAlexW3111297613
LanguageEN
References cited9

This article describes the argumentative steps in the halakhic give-and-take conversations in the Mishnah and Tosefta, which are two compilations written in Tannaitic language, the language that had been used in the first period of Mishnaic Hebrew. The argumentative steps in the conversations are examined, i.e., the connection between the arguments of the sages when they present their views in the conversations. The analysis of argumentative steps in halakhic give-and-take conversations in the Mishnah and Tosefta is based on the model proposed by Muntigl and Turnbull (1998). This model has classified the four types of disagreement acts, which were found in naturally occurring conversations: counterclaim, contradiction, challenge and irrelevancy claim; and it also ranks the degree of aggressiveness of the acts. The study conducted by Blondheim and Blum-Kulka (2001) on a Talmudic text was also based on Muntigl and Turnbull's study. The aim of this article is to try to assess the degree of aggressiveness of the halakhic give-and-take conversations in the Mishnah and Tosefta by means of an examination of the types of argumentative steps. The findings from these two compilations are compared to the findings of the two previous studies

Aesthetics · Argumentation theory · Argumentative · Contradiction · Degree (music · Epistemology · Hebrew · Linguistics · Period (music · Families in Therapy and Culture · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology

  • A fortiori arguments in halachic give-and-take conversations in the Mishnah and Tosefta

    Open Access•Rivka Shemesh-Raiskin•Folia Orientalia•2019

  • Theorising disagreement

    Open Access•Jo Angouri, Michael A Locher et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

  • Traditions of dispute

    Open Access•Shoshana Blum‐kulka, Shoshana Blum-Kulka et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • Conversational structure and facework in arguing

    Open Access•Peter Muntigl, William Turnbull•Journal of Pragmatics•1998

  • Jewish argument as sociability

    Open Access•Deborah Schiffrin•Language in Society•1984

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae