Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality

The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders' Rights in Kenya

Bibliographic Data

ID12566324
AuthorsDwijen Rangnekar (University of Warwick, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume19
Issue3
Pages359-383
Publication date2013-05-28
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew Political Economy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-3467 • E-ISSN: 1469-9923
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13563467.2013.796445
OpenAlexW2140944106
LanguageEN
References cited23

The article is about implementing obligations under Article 27.3(b) of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS). However, concerned with the fragmentation of international law in a globalised world, the article uses Kenya as a case study to interrogate the apparent choice and latitude in Article 27.3(b). At the TRIPS Council, Kenya has sought to locate Article 27.3(b) within a wider frame by adroitly norm-borrowing, and it canvassed for integrating norms and principles from other multilateral agreements into TRIPS. Yet, when introducing plant breeders' rights into domestic law, Kenya fails to either explore the apparent latitude or deliver on its rhetoric in Geneva. I explain this decoupling between Geneva rhetoric (ritual) and domestic law (behaviour) as another symptom of what Steinberg [(2002), ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’, International Organization, 56 (2), pp. 339–74)] characterises as ‘organised hypocrisy’ of the World Trade Organisation. In demonstrating that fragmentation in global legal architecture may not automatically emerge in domestic law, the article draws out the significance of attending to a domestic political economy of law-making

Intellectual property · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Shadow (psychology · Sociology · TRIPS Agreement · TRIPS architecture · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law · World Trade Organization Law

  • Private Power, Public Law

    Open Access•Susan K Sell•Private Power, Public Law•2003

  • Global Business Regulation

    Open Access•John Braithwaite, Peter Drahos•Global business regulation•2000

  • Globalization

    Open Access•Jan Aart Scholte•Globalization•2005

  • Technology Paradigms and the Innovation—Appropriation Interface

    Open Access•Dwijen Rangnekar•Prometheus•1999

  • The Future Control of Food

    Caoimhín MacMaoláin•European Journal of International…•2008

  • Sovereign and property rights over plant genetic resources

    Open Access•Carlos M Correa•Agriculture and Human Values•1995

  • Policies for African seed enterprise development

    Open Access•Robert Tripp, David Rohrbach•Food Policy•2001

  • Globalization

    Open Access•John W Murphy•International Sociology•2006

  • Capacity building and the (re)production of intellectual property rights

    Christopher May•Third World Quarterly•2004

  • In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the Gatt/WTO

    Open Access•Richard H Steinberg•International Organization•2002

  • The Real New World Order

    Anne-Marie Slaughter•Foreign Affairs•1997

  • Territory and Territoriality in the Global Economy

    Open Access•Sassen, Saskia Sassen•International Sociology•2000

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae