Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Navigating the boundaries between evaluators and similar applied professionals

Bibliographic Data

ID12567232
AuthorsDana Linnell Wanzer (0000-0001-9732-4121, University of Wisconsin–Stout, corresponding author), Bianca Montrosse‐Moorhead (0000-0001-8566-0347, University of Connecticut)
Year2023
Volume30
Issue1
Pages138-161
Publication date2023-12-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEvaluation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-3890 • E-ISSN: 1461-7153
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/13563890231213643
OpenAlexW4390058090
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited47

This article is part of a larger project to examine who calls themselves an evaluator and why, as well as how evaluators differ from non-evaluators. For the present article, 40 professionals doing applied work (e.g. evaluators, researchers) participated in an hour-long semi-structured interview, which involved questions about their journey into the field, applied practice, and professional identity. Research questions were: what does the journey into the field look like for evaluators and similar professionals, and how do they describe the similarities and differences between evaluators and other similar professionals? Results showed evaluators and non-evaluators have unique journeys into the field. Furthermore, evaluators and other similar professionals describe the similarities and differences similarly, yet there are also some misconceptions similar professionals have regarding evaluators and evaluation. This article contributes to the larger conversation on the professionalization of evaluation by helping understand the jurisdictional boundaries between evaluation and other related fields

Conversation · Field (mathematics · Identity (music · Medical education · Professionalization · Social science · Sociology · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Medicine · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Student Assessment and Feedback

  • Using formal theory in evaluation – What is it and how is it used

    Open Access•Kim Grey•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2024

  • The Emergent Evaluator

    Open Access•Matt Healey•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2026

  • The garden of evaluation approaches

    Open Access•Daniela C Schröter, Lyssa Wilson Becho et al.•Evaluation•2026

  • The System of Professions

    Andrew Abbott•System of Professions•1988

  • Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations

    Henri Tajfel•Annual Review of Psychology•1982

  • The manifestations of politics in evaluation

    Open Access•Tarek Azzam, Dana Linnell Wanzer et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2021

  • Social Identity

    Robin Jenkins, Richard Jenkins•Social Identity•2014

  • Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•Qualitative Psychology•2022

  • Professional Identity of Evaluators in Israel

    Miri Levin-Rozalis, Miri Levin‐rozali et al.•Canadian Journal of Program…•2008

  • Professionalization and evaluation

    Open Access•Maria Pia Castro, Stefania Fragapane et al.•Evaluation•2016

  • The logic of evaluation professionalism

    Open Access•Robert Picciotto•Evaluation•2011

  • The politics of evaluation in international organizations

    Open Access•Steffen Eckhard, Vytautas Jankauskas•Evaluation•2018

  • To Be or Not to Be a Profession

    Open Access•Steve Jacob, Yves Boisvert•Evaluation•2010

  • Reconstructing professional ethics and responsibility

    Open Access•Thomas A Schwandt•Evaluation•2015

  • University-Based Continuing Education in Evaluation

    Open Access•Wolfgang Beywl, Katja Harich•Evaluation•2007

  • Reconceptualizing Evaluator Roles

    Open Access•Gary Skolits, Gary J Skolits et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2009

  • Material Incentives and Other Potential Factors Associated With Response Rates to Internet Surveys of American Evaluation Association Members

    Open Access•Chris L S Coryn, Lyssa Wilson Becho et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2019

  • Evaluation Science

    Open Access•Michael Quinn Patton•American Journal of Evaluation•2018

  • What Is Evaluation

    Open Access•Dana Linnell Wanzer•American Journal of Evaluation•2020

  • Evaluation Theory is Who We Are

    Open Access•William R Shadish•American Journal of Evaluation•1998

  • Informing the Discussion on Evaluator Training

    Open Access•Christina A Christie, Patricia Quiñones et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2013

  • So What Do You Do? Exploring Evaluator Descriptions of Their Work

    Open Access•Sarah Mason, Ashley Hunt•American Journal of Evaluation•2018

  • External Evaluation as Contract Work

    Open Access•Keith M Sturges, Keith Sturges•American Journal of Evaluation•2014

  • Overcoming our Negative Reputation

    Open Access•Stewart I Donaldson•American Journal of Evaluation•2001

  • Evaluator Training Needs and Competencies

    Open Access•Nicole Galport, Tarek Azzam•American Journal of Evaluation•2016

  • Critical Challenges Confronting Certification of Evaluators

    Open Access•Blaine R Worthen•American Journal of Evaluation•1999

  • Making values explicit in evaluation practice

    Open Access•Amy Gullickson, Kelly M Hannum•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2019

  • From “Pure” to “Hybrid” Professionalism

    Open Access•M Noordegraaf•Administration & Society•2007

  • From Social to Political Identity

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy•Political Psychology•2001

  • Achieving positive social identity

    Linda A Jackson, Linda A Sullivan et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • The Sociological Analysis of Professionalism

    Open Access•Julia Evetts•International Sociology•2003

  • A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities

    Open Access•Julia Evetts•Current Sociology•2011

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae