Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Critical Dialogue in Evaluation

How Can the Interaction between Evaluation and Politics be Tackled

Bibliographic Data

ID12567792
AuthorsOve Karlsson (0000-0003-2020-4695, The Welfare Research Centre, Eskilstuna, Sweden, corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume2
Issue4
Pages405-416
Publication date1996-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEvaluation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-3890 • E-ISSN: 1461-7153
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/135638909600200404
OpenAlexW2028867550
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited19

Evaluation has become an increasingly important steering mechanism in the Swedish political context during the past decade. New steering forms emphasizing political goals and decentralization have increased the demand for evaluation from politicians and for the different stakeholder groups to have a voice in evaluation. In this situation the crucial questions are how to involve claims from unfairly treated groups in evaluation and how to choose which criteria should be used for the selection and judgement of what should be evaluated. Questions like this put evaluation practice in the middle of a value-laden discourse and also raise the question of what strategies the evaluator could choose to handle evaluation within a political context

Context (archaeology · Decentralization · Economics · Judgement · Management science · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Selection (genetic algorithm · Sociology · Stakeholder · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law

  • Examinando elementos que possam influenciar a formulação de políticas em estudos que utilizaram indicadores compostos

    Open Access•Marco Akerman•Ciência & Saúde Coletiva•2000

  • Citizens' Control of Evaluations

    Open Access•Richard Murray•Evaluation•2002

  • User Participation in Quality Assessment

    Open Access•Hanne Kathrine Krogstrup•Evaluation•1997

  • Dialogue as a Democratizing Evaluation Method

    Open Access•Katherine E Ryan, Katherine Ryan et al.•Evaluation•2001

  • Dialogue in Evaluation

    Open Access•Jennifer C Greene•Evaluation•2001

  • Democracy and Evaluation

    Open Access•Ernest R House•Evaluation•2006

  • The European Spatial Approach

    Open Access•Gordon Dabinett, Tim Richardson•Evaluation•1999

  • Opening Thoughts

    Open Access•Tineke Abma, Tineke A Abma•Evaluation•2001

  • Performance Information for Democracy

    Open Access•Christopher Pollitt•Evaluation•2006

  • Foundations of Program Evaluation

    Laura C Leviton, Thomas D Cook et al.•Foundations of Program Evaluation•1990

  • Negotiations

    Anselm L Strauss•Negotiations•1978

  • Whose Justice? Which Rationality?

    Alasdair Macintyre•New Social Theory Reader•2020

  • Whose Justice? Which Rationality?

    Charles Larmore, Alasdair Macintyre•The Journal of Philosophy•1989

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  • Fourth-Generation Evaluation

    Anne Neufeld, Alan Ryan et al.•Canadian Journal of Program…•1988

  • Four Philosophies and Their Practice in Education and Religion

    James Street Fulton, J Donald Butler•The Philosophical Review•1952

  • Spheres of Justice

    Michael Walzer•Spheres of Justice•1984

  • The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self

    Open Access•Michael J Sandel•Political Theory•1984

  • Negotiations. Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order

    Emmanuèle Reynaud, Anselm L Strau et al.•Revue Française de Sociologie•1980

Citations per year0.31
Citation span1997 - 2006 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae