Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Populist Bullshit

A Normative Theory of Populist Communication

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12568753
AutoresRubén Marciel (0000-0002-3906-949X, autor correspondente)
Ano2025
Data de publicação2025-10-31
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoRes Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Politicas (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1576-4184 • E-ISSN: 1989-6115
EditoraSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s11158-025-09744-9
OpenAlexW4415733323
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas34

Although communication scholars have extensively documented how populist actors engage in deceitful forms of speech, it remains unclear why populists so blatantly disregard truth. This article addresses that question by drawing on the works of Laclau and Mouffe to develop a normative theory of populist communication. This theory posits that, to successfully achieve their goal of uniting ‘the people’ against ‘the elite,’ populist actors should produce three distinct kinds of discourse: agonistic, articulating, and mobilizing. Against this theoretical backdrop, the article advances three claims that shed light on the relationship between populism and deception. First, while populist speech is indifferent to truth, it need not involve lies, as its functions can be fulfilled by non-lying strategies such as cherry-picking and the avoidance of falsifiable statements. Second, due to its indifference to truth, populist speech is nonetheless prone to containing lies, which are likely to increase in number as populist actors gain popularity. Third, populist speech can be conceptualized as a specific variant of what Harry Frankfurt defined as ‘bullshit,’ which I refer to as ‘populist bullshit.’ The article thus bridges political theory and empirical research, provides a novel theoretical framework for understanding populist communication, and poses a direct challenge to the acceptability of populism as a political strategy

Falsifiability · Normative · Political communication · Political philosophy · Politics · Populism · Global Security and Public Health · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Populism, Right-Wing Movements

  • Me the People

    Nadia Urbinati•Me the People•2019

  • Deliberative Newsworthiness

    Rubén Marciel•Journal of Media Ethics•2025

  • The Epistemic Basic Structure

    Open Access•Faik Kurtulmus•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2020

  • Deliberation and Non-Deliberative Communication

    Open Access•E Beauvais•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2020

  • The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics

    Silvio Waisbord•Communication Research and Practice•2018

  • On Bullshit

    Harry G Frankfurt•On Bullshit•2005

  • Populismo y discursos del odio

    Open Access•Rubén Marciel•Isegoría•2022

  • Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign

    Open Access•Andreu Casero-Ripollés, Ramón A Feenstra et al.•The International Journal of…•2016

  • Populism and Democratic Theory

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Stephen Macedo•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2019

  • Hegemony, Democracy, Agonism and Journalism

    N Carpentier, Bart Cammaerts•Journalism Studies•2006

  • The Place of Self‐Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge et al.•Journal of Political Philosophy•2009

  • The Law of Group Polarization

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein•Journal of Political Philosophy•2002

  • On citizens' right to information

    Open Access•Rubén Marciel•Journal of Political Philosophy•2023

  • What Is Populism

    Jan-Werner Müller, Jan‐werner Müller•What Is Populism?•2016

  • In search of enemies

    Open Access•Jonny Hall•Politics•2021

  • What is Politics? The Approach of Radical Pluralism

    Open Access•Mark Anthony Wenman, Mark Wenman•Politics•2003

  • Populist Gullibility

    Open Access•Jan-Willem Van Prooijen, Talia Cohen Rodrigues et al.•Political Psychology•2022

  • When Corrections Fail

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•Political Behavior•2010

  • Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Ethan Porter et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • Understanding democratic conflicts

    Open Access•Vincent August•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Populism as political communication style

    Open Access•Jan Jagers, Stefaan Walgrave•European Journal of Political…•2007

  • Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation

    Open Access•Lisa Disch•American Political Science Review•2011

  • The Concept of the Political

    Carl Schmitt, George Schwab et al.•The concept of the political•2007

  • Why Constructing a People Is the Main Task of Radical Politics

    Ernesto Laclau, Laclau et al.•Critical Inquiry•2006

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae