Populist Bullshit
A Normative Theory of Populist Communication
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12568753 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rubén Marciel (0000-0002-3906-949X, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-10-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Politicas (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1576-4184 • E-ISSN: 1989-6115 |
| Editora | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11158-025-09744-9 |
| OpenAlex | W4415733323 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 34 |
Although communication scholars have extensively documented how populist actors engage in deceitful forms of speech, it remains unclear why populists so blatantly disregard truth. This article addresses that question by drawing on the works of Laclau and Mouffe to develop a normative theory of populist communication. This theory posits that, to successfully achieve their goal of uniting ‘the people’ against ‘the elite,’ populist actors should produce three distinct kinds of discourse: agonistic, articulating, and mobilizing. Against this theoretical backdrop, the article advances three claims that shed light on the relationship between populism and deception. First, while populist speech is indifferent to truth, it need not involve lies, as its functions can be fulfilled by non-lying strategies such as cherry-picking and the avoidance of falsifiable statements. Second, due to its indifference to truth, populist speech is nonetheless prone to containing lies, which are likely to increase in number as populist actors gain popularity. Third, populist speech can be conceptualized as a specific variant of what Harry Frankfurt defined as ‘bullshit,’ which I refer to as ‘populist bullshit.’ The article thus bridges political theory and empirical research, provides a novel theoretical framework for understanding populist communication, and poses a direct challenge to the acceptability of populism as a political strategy
Falsifiability · Normative · Political communication · Political philosophy · Politics · Populism · Global Security and Public Health · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Me the People
Deliberative Newsworthiness
The Epistemic Basic Structure
Deliberation and Non-Deliberative Communication
The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics
On Bullshit
Populismo y discursos del odio
Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign
Populism and Democratic Theory
Hegemony, Democracy, Agonism and Journalism
The Place of Self‐Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy
The Law of Group Polarization
On citizens' right to information
What Is Populism
In search of enemies
What is Politics? The Approach of Radical Pluralism
Populist Gullibility
When Corrections Fail
Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability
Understanding democratic conflicts
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Populism as political communication style
Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation
The Concept of the Political
Why Constructing a People Is the Main Task of Radical Politics
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |