Coach–athlete sexual relationships
If no means no does yes mean yes
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12573113 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Susanne Johansson (0000-0002-5575-4737, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 678-693 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-04-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Sport Education and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1357-3322 • E-ISSN: 1470-1243 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13573322.2013.777662 |
| OpenAlex | W1996436927 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 37 |
Coach–athlete romantic relationships and consensual sexual relations are commonly accepted among coaches and athletes, although a growing number of sport organisations discourage or prohibit such relationships. In research, coach–athlete sexual relationships are lumped together with sexual abuse, suggested to harm athletes' well-being, performance, athletic career and team dynamics, and to inherently constitute an abuse of power, trust and ethics. In addition, mistrust of coaches' motives, related to physical touch and fear of sexual misconduct, has resulted in a growing anxiety among coaches. This paper highlights and critically discusses research conceptualisations, contextual understandings and critical issues surrounding coach–athlete sexual relationships, on which there is no comprehensive research outside the sexual abuse context. Studies of authority–subordinate romantic relationships in other social settings have reported that such relationships facilitate both positive and negative characteristics and outcomes. To prevent and reduce harm and to promote well-being, functionality and safe practice in coach–athlete sexual and non-sexual relationships, I suggest that comprehensive research outside the sexual abuse context is required. In addition to the previous research focus on harmful and abusive relationships, coach–athlete sexual relationships that are experienced as consenting and mutually fulfilling by the involved parties need further examination
Anxiety · Athletes · Context (archaeology · Criminology · Harm · Poison control · Psychiatry · Romance · Sexual abuse · Sexual misconduct · Suicide prevention · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sport Psychology and Performance · Sports Analytics and Performance · Sports, Gender, and Society
A Dutch perspective on sexual integrity in sport contexts
Am I sexually abused?’ Consent in a coach-athlete lesbian relationship
Young Athletes’ Perceptions of Coach-Athlete Sexual Relationships
Sexual harassment, abuse and intimate relationships between coaches and athletes
Physical contact in physical education, sports coaching and the preschool – a scoping review
A Qualitative Exploration of a Biopsychosocial Profile for Experiencing Sexual Harassment and Abuse in Sports
This might be him; the guy I'm gonna marry
From Policy to Practice
Risk Society
Against our will
Men and women of the corporation
Spoilsports
Partner Preferences
Discipline and Punish
Unethical intimacy
Child abuse, child protection, and defensive ‘touch’ in PE teaching and sports coaching
Sports coaching in risk society
Surveillance and conformity in competitive youth swimming
Sport and the sexually abused male child1
Safeguarding’ sports coaching
Coaches, Ethics and Autonomy
Male and female responses to ambiguous instructor behaviors
Against Our Will. Men, Women and Rape
Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation
Workplace Romances between Senior- Level Executives and Lower-Level Employees
Why Humans Have Sex
Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection
Risk society
The evolution of desire
Discipline and Punish
Sexual Harassment in Sport
The Forbidden Zone
Male Coach/Female Athlete Relations
Sexuality in the Workplace
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,8 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 8 |