Bodo ethnic self-rule and persistent violence in Assam

A failed case of multinational federalism in India

Bibliographic Data

ID12575701
AuthorsHarihar Bhattacharyya (University of Burdwan, corresponding author), Jhumpa Mukherjee (0000-0003-0031-6577, Department of Political Science, St. Xavier’s College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India)
Year2018
Volume28
Issue4
Pages469-487
Publication date2018-05-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRegional & Federal Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1359-7566 • E-ISSN: 1743-9434
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13597566.2018.1478293
OpenAlexW2806753499
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited21

Indian federalism has been credited in the literature on comparative federalism for having successfully resolved many of its ethnic conflicts (in a country of immense ethnic diversity) since 1956 by conceding varied forms of statehood. In most cases, the resolution of ethnic conflict has entailed self-determination for ethno-nationalist groups. There are however cases when the experiment has failed and the institutional arrangements for recognition of ethnic self-determination have given birth to more conflicts and persistent violence. In this article, we argue that the Bodoland Territorial Authority (created in 2003) in Assam is a failed case of multinational federalism in India. We argue that the case of Bodoland illustrates the limits of territorial management when groups are intermixed and highlight the need for power sharing in government and/or non-territorial representation as a better method for managing ethnic conflict in such cases

Development economics · Economics · Ethnic group · Federalism · Geography · Multinational corporation · Political science · Politics · Indian History and Philosophy · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · South Asian Studies and Conflicts

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub