Assessing space utilisation relative to key performance indicators – how well, not how much, space is used
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12576717 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Simon Fleming (0000-0002-4095-9924, The University of Sydney, corresponding author), Nathan Apps (The University of Sydney), Paul Harbon (The University of Sydney), Clive Baldock (0000-0001-7559-3769, Macquarie University) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 503-515 |
| Publication date | 2012-09-26 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-080X • E-ISSN: 1469-9508 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1360080x.2012.715999 |
| OpenAlex | W2120312380 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Efficient use of resources, including space, is critical in academic departments. Traditional space auditing simply assesses occupancy levels. We present a novel approach which assesses not just the extent to which space is used, but also how well it is used. We link space use quantitatively to key performance indicators in a research-intensive university department. A clear picture of how well each room is being used to meet a range of performance goals is obtained. Performance criteria are developed based on the survey data distributions and benchmarked against performance expectations. These criteria are applied to analyse the survey data, readily identifying underperforming space. This provides management, through a transparent process, with evidence-based information with which to facilitate change management to improve performance
Audit · Business · Computer security · Data science · Economics · Key (lock · Management science · Operations research · Process (computing · Process management · Computer Science · Engineering · Facilities and Workplace Management · Accounting
| Highly cited | No |
|---|