Are Australian schools becoming less inclusive? Changes to class ability grouping practices in Australian secondary schools
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12578985 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Olivia Johnston (0000-0003-3314-9031, Edith Cowan University, autor correspondente), Peter Palamara (0000-0001-8163-3333, Edith Cowan University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Páginas | 1-23 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-07-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Inclusive Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1360-3116 • E-ISSN: 1464-5173 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13603116.2025.2527256 |
| OpenAlex | W4412357168 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 40 |
Class ability grouping does not improve overall academic results, and is inequitable because it segregates students according to their disability, race, class, gender, and other factors that already make students at risk in education. The practice is not inclusive and previous research has shown that it exacerbates social disadvantage. Despite the evidence, historical efforts to change practices in Australia have been unsuccessful and many schools still use class ability grouping. This paper presents analysis of data from the Class Ability Grouping Survey about how often schools reported changing their class ability grouping practices in Year 7–9 Mathematics, English, Science, and Humanities. Data from n = 193 secondary schools across five states show that 70% of schools reported no changes since 2021. However, significant changes were introduced in the remaining schools, with more schools increasing (17.6%) than decreasing (11.8%) class ability grouping practices. There were more changes in independent schools, larger schools, and schools already using class ability grouping than in government schools, smaller schools, and schools using mixed ability grouping. Schools’ changing practices suggest that decision makers were not always confident in their grouping practices and may be open to change, findings that can guide future research and policy in Australia
Class (philosophy · Inclusion (mineral · Mainstreaming · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Sociology · Special education · Early Childhood Education and Development · Education Systems and Policy · Gender Studies · Psychology · School Choice and Performance
Equity in Education
A teacher expectation intervention
What One Hundred Years of Research Says About the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement
Teachers and differentiated instruction
Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ‘ability grouping’ in England
The Effect of School Tracking on Student Achievement and Inequality
Why do schools continue to use between-class ability grouping
Looking at the future from the periphery of the system
Cultural beliefs and equity in educational institutions
Grouped out of STEM degrees
The ability-track glass ceiling of Israeli schooling
The tyranny of setting (ability grouping)
Analysing ability grouping in secondary school
Shopping for schools or shopping for peers
A national survey of ability grouping practices in secondary school physical education in England
Attainment grouping in English secondary schools
How Streaming (Tracking) in Eighth Grade Mathematics Reinforces Racialized Social Class Inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand
Secondary school pupils' satisfaction with their ability grouping placements
The achievement gap
A Multination Study of Socioeconomic Inequality in Expectations for Progression to Higher Education
Debunking the Grit Narrative in Higher Education
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |