Giving Hope to Fathers’
Discursive Constructions of Families and Family Law by McKenzie Friends Associated With Fathers’ Rights Groups
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12582992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Angela Melville (0000-0003-0729-2539, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 147-173 |
| Publication date | 2017-04-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Law Policy and the Family (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-9939 • E-ISSN: 1464-3707 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/lawfam/ebx004 |
| OpenAlex | W2619070863 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 23 |
A McKenzie Friend is a lay person who provides assistance to a self-representing litigant (SRL) in court. Traditionally, McKenzie Friends have been friends, family members or occasionally charities that have provided assistance free of charge. In England and Wales, there is anecdotal evidence that there has been a significant increase in the number of McKenzie Friends supporting SRLs, and, as their numbers have increased, their role has changed. Many are now paid ‘professionals’ who offer a range of legal services. These ‘professional’ McKenzie Friends usually act in family law matters, and some are associated with fathers’ rights groups (FRGs). This article analyses the social media presence of McKenzie Friends associated with FRGs, including how they construct the services they offer and the family law system in which they operate. It shows that many McKenzie Friends associated with FRGs assert that fathers are victims of gender bias in the family justice system, lawyers are unaffordable, untrustworthy, and excessively adversarial, and only McKenzie Friends can produce the outcomes wanted by fathers. While most of their websites support simplistic and decontextualized concepts of ‘formal equality’, other forms of social media, such as Facebook sites and blogs, often explicitly construct family law issues in misogynist terms. Thus, it is argued that McKenzie Friends associated with FRGs promote powerful social myths that support gender inequality and violence against women, and deny children’s rights
Adversarial system · Construct (python library · Economic Justice · Family law · Political science · Sociology · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Psychology · Sex work and related issues · Law
Backlash
“But the data is already public”
Exploring A New Family Form - The Shared Time Family
So Presumably Things Have Moved on Since Then?' The Management of Risk Allegations in Child Contact Dispute Resolution
Separated fathers and the ‘fathers’ rights’ movement
Fathers' Rights Groups
Contact Disputes
Self-represented litigants
Fathers' rights, gender and welfare
Adversarial Mythologies
Equal shares
The 'Best Interests of the Child' and Parental Separation
The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody
Dominant Discourse, Professional Language, and Legal Change in Child Custody Decisionmaking
A Semiotics of the Public/Private Distinction
Fathers' Rights Groups, Domestic Violence and Political Countermobilization
The Fathers' Rights Movement
On the Cusp of a Movement
Ordinary, Ambivalent and Defensive
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |