From 'Bidie-in' to 'Cohabitant' in Scotland
The Perils of Legislative Compromise
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12583452 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elaine E Sutherland (University of Stirling, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 143-175 |
| Publication date | 2013-05-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Law Policy and the Family (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-9939 • E-ISSN: 1464-3707 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/lawfam/ebt006 |
| OpenAlex | W2032934630 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 18 |
For the most part, ‘first world’ legal systems have long since abandoned the criminalization of non-marital cohabitation and no longer refuse to recognize cohabitation contracts on public policy grounds. Beyond that, however, there is considerable division over whether to attach marriage-like consequences to cohabitation. Much of the debate juxtaposes respect for party autonomy and protection, with advocates for greater protection focusing on the functional similarity of cohabitation and marriage and widespread misconceptions about the legal consequences of cohabiting. The Scottish Law Commission embraced compromise in its recommendations for reform of the law on cohabitation and sought to balance protection of the vulnerable and respect for autonomy. While the legislation that resulted departed somewhat from these recommendations and suffered from defective drafting, it too took a compromise position. Using the lens of these legislative provisions, this article argues that such an approach leads to a loss of coherence in the law, judicial divergence, public confusion and creates a false sense of security among the ill-informed. In addition, it invites incremental expansion of the law without a firm policy decision being taken. The article concludes that a better course would be to take that policy decision and to put cohabitants on an equal footing with those in formal relationships, while respecting autonomy by allowing the parties to opt out of the new regime
Autonomy · Cohabitation · Common law · Compromise · Law and economics · Law reform · Legislation · Legislature · Political science · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Law
Cohabitation
The Dutch Approach To Informal Lifestyles
Cohabitation and Marriage Law – A Comparative Study
Demographic aspects of cohabitation in Great Britain
Pacs Seven Years on
Regulation of unmarried cohabitation in west-European jurisdictions - determinants of legal policy
The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in western Europe
The Case Against Legal Recognition of Cohabitation
Unmarried Cohabitation and Parenthood in Britain and Europe
Obligations Between Adult Partners
Debates and issues regarding marriage and cohabitation in the British and American literature
Marriage and the Moral Bases of Personal Relationships
Ignorance in Bliss
Overview Chapter 4
Reexamining the Case for Marriage
The role of cohabitation in family formation
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.45 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2020 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |