Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cumulative jurisprudence and human rights

The example of sexual minorities and hate speech

Bibliographic Data

ID12593191
AuthorsEric Heinze (0000-0002-0471-4954, Queen Mary University of London, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume13
Issue2-3
Pages193-209
Publication date2009-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Human Rights (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1364-2987 • E-ISSN: 1744-053X
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13642980902758119
OpenAlexW2028549919
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Leading non-discrimination norms in post-1945 human rights instruments have generally enumerated specified categories for protection, such as race, ethnicity, sex, and religion. They have often omitted express reference to sexual minorities. However, through ‘such as’ or ‘other status’ clauses, or otherwise open-ended phrasing or interpretation, such instruments have generated a ‘cumulative jurisprudence’, whereby sexual minorities subsequently become incorporated through analogical reasoning. That cumulative jurisprudence has yielded protections for sexual minorities through norms governing, e.g., privacy, employment, age of consent, and freedoms of speech and association. Hate speech bans, too, have often been formulated with reference only to more traditionally recognised categories, particularly race and religion, rarely making express reference to sexual minorities. It might therefore be expected that the same cumulative jurisprudence should be applied, such that their scope might be extended to encompass sexual minorities. In this paper, however, that approach is challenged. It is argued that hate speech bans suffer in themselves from deep flaws. Either they promote discrimination by limiting the number of protected categories, or, by including all meritorious categories, they would dramatically limit free speech. While sexual minorities within longstanding, stable and prosperous democracies should generally enjoy all human rights, it is argued that they should not seek the protection of hate speech bans, which run real risks of betraying fundamental principles of human rights law

Criminology · Ethnic group · Free speech · Human rights · Jurisprudence · Political science · Race (biology · Sociology · Gender Studies · Human Rights and Development · International Law and Human Rights · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Psychology

  • On the Undecidability of Legal and Technological Regulation

    Open Access•Michael Peter Kalule•Law and Critique•2019

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,14
Citation span2019 - 2019 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae