Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Capabilities, human rights and moral pluralism

Bibliographic Data

ID12593374
AuthorsJ Alexander (0000-0002-4627-6665, Yahoo (United Kingdom), corresponding author), John M Alexander
Year2004
Volume8
Issue4
Pages451-469
Publication date2004-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Human Rights (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1364-2987 • E-ISSN: 1744-053X
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1364298042000283585
OpenAlexW1976849098
LanguageEN
Citations received11

Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, the pioneers of the capability approach, have divergent views on human rights. Sen considers human rights to be a set of goals towards which every society could progress. In contrast, Nussbaum thinks of human rights as side constraints and as non-negotiable fundamental entitlements for international standard-setting and national public policy debates. The article critically examines the difference between these two views and explores the relation between the concept of capabilities and human rights. It argues for an approach of moral pluralism which could clarify and press forward pertinent issues relating to socio-economic rights and group rights

Capability approach · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Fundamental rights · Human rights · International human rights law · Law and economics · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Sociology · Human Rights and Development · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Capability Egalitarianism and Moral Selfhood

    J Alexander, John M Alexander•Ethical Perspectives•2003

  • Human rights within education

    Tristan Mccowan•Cambridge Journal of Education•2012

  • Future-proofing the city

    Open Access•Alina Wernick, Anna Artyushina•Internet Policy Review•2023

  • Capabilities Approach to Youth Rights in East Africa

    Sahaya G Selvam•The International Journal of…•2008

  • Social Protection

    Open Access•Marianne S Ulriksen, Sophie Plagerson•World Development•2014

  • Information Human Obligations

    Open Access•Oleksandr O Tykhomyrov, Denys Tykhomyrov et al.•The Age of Human Rights Journal•2023

  • Problems and perspectives in research into the quality of work life in organisational studies

    Open Access•Anna Gogoleva, Pavel S Sorokin et al.•Society and Economy•2017

  • Development, Human Rights, and Human Capabilities

    William F Birdsall•Journal of Human Rights•2014

  • Linkage between social sector’s spending and HDI

    Ramesh Chandra Das, Chhanda Mandal et al.•Review of Social Economy•2021

  • Ending the liberal hegemony

    Open Access•J Alexander, John M Alexander•Contemporary Political Theory•2010

  • Proposing a Social Justice Approach to Diaconia for a South African Context

    Open Access•Jacques Walter Beukes, Laurika Elouise Beukes•Religions•2023

Citations per year0.48
Citation span2003 - 2023 (21)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae