Human rights pitted against man (II) – a response
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12594092 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kay Goodall (0009-0000-0509-6361, University of Stirling, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1165-1184 |
| Publication date | 2010-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Human Rights (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1364-2987 • E-ISSN: 1744-053X |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13642980903301919 |
| OpenAlex | W2006705608 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
The article responds to another article in this issue of the journal, ‘Human rights pitted against man (II) – the network is back’, by Jakob Cornides. It considers the arguments he puts forward regarding inaccuracy and lack of objectivity in an opinion and a report produced by two influential fundamental rights agencies of the European Union. It finds that the arguments are, for the most part, misconceived, but welcomes the opportunity for a debate on the larger issues raised by Cornides' contribution
Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · European union · Fundamental rights · Human rights · International trade · Law and economics · Objectivity (philosophy · Political science · Sociology · International Law and Human Rights · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |