Human rights through the kaleidoscope
The UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12594154 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kathryn Mcneilly (0000-0001-9488-2232, Queen's University Belfast, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-21 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Human Rights (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1364-2987 • E-ISSN: 1744-053X |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13642987.2025.2588188 |
| OpenAlex | W4416950145 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United Nations Human Rights Council has emerged as a distinct lens to view fulfilment of state obligations. It is one that has grown in prominence to now constitute a key part of observing human rights worldwide. However, thinking about the UPR as a lens has not yet been extensively undertaken. The present article illuminates this element of the mechanism’s identity, enhancing understanding of how the UPR’s lens works and the view that it offers. To do so, it looks to the concept of the kaleidoscope. The UPR demonstrates three components that map onto the kaleidoscope as an optical device: it produces a picture of human rights that is made up of many inter-connected elements; reflects these elements via mirrors that are built into the process; and generates an ever-changing picture that is capable of infinite variation. These components operate in a double-edged manner to pose potential challenges for viewing human rights as well as to offer utility. Ultimately, the article argues that sufficient grounds arise to justify the mechanism’s continued engagement as a lens, albeit this must be informed by more conscious conceptual foundations. Approached in this manner, the UPR offers a view through the kaleidoscope that brings human rights into focus in rich and textured ways
Element (criminal law · Focus (optics · Fundamental rights · Human rights · Kaleidoscope · Through-the-lens metering · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Human Rights and Development · Law in Society and Culture
The relational politics of shame
The United Nations Human Rights Council
Dissecting Stakeholder Participation in UN Human Rights Treaty Body Activities with Normative and Empirical Approaches
Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice
The Use of International Human Rights Law in the Universal Periodic Review
A Voice Not an Echo
The Temporal Ontology of the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review
Universal Periodic Review and Policy Change
Universal Periodic Review and its Limited Change Potential
Complementing UN Human Rights Efforts Through Universal Periodic Review
The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration
(Geo)Politics of Universal Periodic Review
Theoretical challenges to understanding the potential impact of the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism
Implementing international human rights norms
Separate or inseparable? How discourse interpreting law and politics as separable categories shaped the formation of the UN Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review
Reservations to human rights treaties in recommendations from the universal periodic review
Kaleidoscopic Justice
How time matters in the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review
The UN Human Rights Council
A network analysis of naming and shaming in the universal periodic review
Between learning and schooling
Promoting Compliance with Human Rights
Deliberative Capacity Building through International Organizations
The Improvement of the UN Machinery on Human Rights
I. From UN Commission on Human Rights to UN Human Rights Council
If Only for a Day
| Highly cited | No |
|---|