Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bystanders, noise, and distractions in face-to-face surveys in Africa and Latin America

Bibliographic Data

ID12595208
AuthorsCharles Q Lau (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA), Charles Lau (0000-0003-3485-5632, RTI International, corresponding author), Melissa Baker (0000-0001-7064-5881, TNS Africa Region, Nairobi, Kenya), Melissa A Baker (0000-0002-6087-1479), Andrew Fiore (Facebook, Menlo Park, CA, USA), Andrew T Fiore (Meta (United States)), D L Greene (0000-0002-7667-5376, RTI International), Diana Greene (0000-0002-0856-9504, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA), Min Lieskovsky (Facebook, Menlo Park, CA, USA), Kim Matu (TNS Africa Region, Nairobi, Kenya), Emilia Peytcheva (0009-0008-7012-6537, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA)
Year2016
Volume20
Issue5
Pages469-483
Publication date2016-07-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1364-5579 • E-ISSN: 1464-5300
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13645579.2016.1208959
OpenAlexW2506430035
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited17

Survey researchers are increasingly concerned that the presence of other people (bystanders) may affect data quality in structured, face-to-face survey interviews. In this article, we study bystanders using data from 15,309 face-to-face surveys about technology from Ghana, Nigeria, Uganda, Brazil and Guatemala. Our analysis (1) describes the frequency of bystander presence (spouses, parents, other family and non-family members), (2) investigates the correlates of bystander presence, and (3) studies whether bystanders affect response distributions, ‘don’t know’ responses, and satisficing behavior. We also consider the influence of other environmental factors – noise and distractions – on interviewer–respondent interaction and satisficing. The results are encouraging for the field of survey research. Bystanders did not affect response distributions, the number of ‘don’t know’ responses, or satisficing behavior. Although noise negatively affected interviewer–respondent interactions, noise did not affect data quality. Our research suggests that for less sensitive topics, bystanders have limited influence, and also that respondents and interviewers are resilient to challenges such as noisy environments

Affect (linguistics · Interview · Political science · Quality (philosophy · Respondent · Satisficing · Sociology · Statistics · Survey data collection · Applied Psychology · Communication · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Bystanders and response bias in face-to-face surveys in Africa

    Zack Zimbalist•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • El Rol de la Ubicación y la Presencia de Terceras Personas en la Revelación de Experiencias de Violencia en la Pareja en una Encuesta Personal

    Open Access•Carmen M Leon, Eva Aizpurua•Empiria Revista de metodología de…•2024

  • Effects of Partner Presence During the Interview on Survey Responses

    Open Access•Jette Schröder, Claudia Schmiedeberg•Sociological Methods & Research•2023

  • Cultural and Interviewer Effects on Interview Privacy

    Open Access•Zeina Mneimneh, Zeina N Mneimneh et al.•Cross-Cultural Research•2018

  • Gender-of-Interviewer Effects on Support for Women’s Rights and Democracy in Africa

    Open Access•Zack Zimbalist•Government and Opposition•2025

  • Third-Party Effects in Stakeholder Interviews

    Open Access•Melissa Beresford, J Leah Jones et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Open Access•Roger Tourangeau, Lance J Rips et al.•Psychology of Survey Response•2000

  • Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Applied Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • On Third Persons in the Interview Situation and Their Impact on Responses

    Karl-Heinz Reuband•International Journal of Public…•1992

  • Research on Interviewing Techniques

    Charles F Cannell, Peter V Miller et al.•Sociological Methodology•1981

  • Effects of Spouse Presence During the Interview on Survey Responses Concerning Marriage

    William S Aquilino•Public Opinion Quarterly•1993

  • Using MP3 Players in Surveys

    Simon Chauchard, Chauchard•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

  • Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations

    Brady T West, Frauke Kreuter•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

  • She Said, He Said, They Said

    John F Zipp, Joann Toth•Public Opinion Quarterly•2002

  • Assessment of Cigarette Smoking and Smoking Susceptibility among Youth

    Joel M Moskowitz•Public Opinion Quarterly•2004

  • Survey Analysis for the Guidance of Family Planning Programs

    C Chandrasekaran•Population Studies•1985

  • Who Overreports Voting

    Open Access•Brian D Silver, Barbara A Anderson et al.•American Political Science Review•1986

  • And Then There Were Three

    Open Access•Hennie Boeije, H R Boeije•CAM•2004

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0.75
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae