Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Procedural tradition in the Italian Criminal Justice System

The Semi-adversarial Reform in 1989 and the inquisitorial cultural resistance to adversarial principles

Bibliographic Data

ID12595607
AuthorsRiccardo Montana (City, University of London, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume20
Issue4
Pages289-304
Publication date2016-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Evidence & Proof (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1365-7127 • E-ISSN: 1740-5572
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1365712716655164
OpenAlexW2547333587
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited15

The reform of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure (ccp) in 1989 was an ambitious attempt to transplant adversarial principles in a Criminal Justice System (CJS) that was rooted in its inquisitorial structure. From the pure legal perspective, the reform failed because the CJS appears now as a superimposition of adversarial values on a structure that remains inquisitorial. From the socio-legal comparative perspective, however, there are other contextual issues that deserve to be analysed. Following the introduction, I will focus on the changes that have taken place in the Italian ccp in 1989. This part of the article will explain the new semi-adversarial legal structure of the Italian CJS and the reasons why the current procedural system appears very complicated. The second part of the article will concentrate on the inquisitorial cultural resistance that Italian legal actors use to oppose the adversarial reform. The cultural analysis will be emphasised through the contextualisation of the 1989 reform in the Italian distinctive socio-political environment. In the third part I will analyse prosecutors’ legal culture to discuss the internalisation of adversarial principles in the Italian CJS. The conclusion will emphasise the importance of socio-legal asymmetrical comparisons to study the evolution and harmonisation of European procedural traditions

Adversarial system · Criminal justice · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Law reform · Legal culture · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Politics · Procedural justice · Sociology · Comparative and International Law Studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture

  • In Memoriam

    Open Access•MAURO BARELLI, Andrew Choo et al.•The International Journal of…•2017

  • The role of the judge in the European plea bargaining procedures

    Open Access•Ali Emrah Bozbayındır•The International Journal of…•2023

  • The Culture of Control

    David Garland, Mary Vogel•Crime, Inequality and the State•2001

  • Adversarialism in Italy

    Riccardo Montana•European Journal of Crime…•2012

  • Paradigms of Judicial Supervision and Co-Ordination between Police and Prosecutors

    Riccardo Montana•European Journal of Crime…•2009

  • The Judges and Political Corruption in Italy

    David Nelken•Journal of Law and Society•1996

  • The Legal System

    Open Access•Donald M Roper•Political Science Quarterly•1976

  • Columbia Journal of Transnational Law

    Open Access•Eleanor H Finch•American Journal of International…•1965

  • The Effect of Human Rights on Criminal Evidentiary Processes

    Open Access•John D Jackson•Modern Law Review•2005

  • Italian Criminal Justice

    E Grande•The American Journal of…•2000

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,22
Citation span2017 - 2023 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae