Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Belief Evidence and Informer Privilege

Revisited in Strasbourg

Bibliographic Data

ID12595952
AuthorsColin King (0000-0001-8537-5853, University of Manchester, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume18
Issue4
Pages340-352
Publication date2014-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Evidence & Proof (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1365-7127 • E-ISSN: 1740-5572
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1350/ijep.2014.18.4.465
OpenAlexW15967440
LanguageEN

Belief evidence of a senior police officer is a key tool in the Irish approach to prosecuting terrorist activities. While belief evidence has been subjected to criticism, the use of such evidence has received judicial imprimatur. Having been endorsed by the Irish Supreme Court in 2006, it was only a matter of time before such evidence would be challenged in the European Court of Human Rights. Belief evidence was considered by the Strasbourg Court in Donohoe v Ireland, 1 where the focus was on a claim of privilege over the source of a police officer’s belief. In a somewhat timid judgment, the European Court of Human Rights held that the claim of privilege did not render the applicant’s trial unfair

Epistemology · Political science · Privilege (computing · Criminal Law and Evidence · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Torture, Ethics, and Law

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae