Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reverence ( Ehrfurcht ) for the Living World as the Basic Bioethical Principle

Anthropological–Pedagogical Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID12596386
AuthorsVasileios E Pantazis (0000-0002-2523-110X, University of Thessaly, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume12
Issue2
Pages255-266
Publication date2009-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthics Place & Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1366-879X • E-ISSN: 1469-6703
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13668790902863507
OpenAlexW2096375307
LanguageEN
References cited6

Nowadays, nature is something foreign to the human being. It is material that the human being uses, makes available, and exploits without scruples. But the human being is never a subject outside of space: he is always in lived and experienced relations to space, which determine and influence him. The individual is a member of a community of interdependent parts. In order to fulfil his or her life, the human being has to be able to listen to the voice of nature, and abstain from the wish to control it. In such a field the lost reverence for the living world can be cultivated. Responsibility for nature is not an empty phrase, but a moral imperative that is directly connected with human life and survival. This is why we must protect the integrity of nature, and demand there be a better relationship between the human being and nature. This paper discusses the bioethical principle of ‘reverence’ (German Ehrfurcht) for the living world, a concept initially presented by Albert Schweitzer using anthropological–pedagogical methods. The point of view advanced here is based on the anthropological approach of the philosopher and pedagogue O. F. Bollnow, and makes use of work by the pedagogue Yukichi Shitahodo about the anthropological preconditions of relations between a human being and the exterior world. The thesis that ‘reverence’ could be the basic bioethical principle governing the relationship between a human being and his environment is also founded on the modern bioethics, particularly the ‘principle of responsibility’ and the ‘ethical imperative of prudence’ as these have been formulated by philosophical biology and anthropology

Bioethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Prudence · Reverence · Sociology · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Law · Philosophy · Scientific and Historical Analyses · Sustainability, Environment, and Optimization Algorithms

  • Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch

    Helmuth Plessner•Die Stufen des Organischen und…•1928

  • The Imperative of Responsibility

    Hans Jonas•The Imperative of Responsibility•1984

  • One Long Argument

    Valerie A Haines, Ernst Mayr•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1992

  • Phenomenologies of Environment and Place

    Open Access•David Seamon•Phenomenology + Pedagogy•1984

  • Analytische Einführung in die Ethik

    Dieter Birnbacher•Analytische Einführung in die Ethik•2007

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae