Technical and organizational challenges in the risk management of road infrastructures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12596855 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roberta Troisi (0000-0001-6439-2611, University of Salerno), Paolo Castaldo (0000-0002-7956-9392, Politecnico di Torino, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 791-806 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Risk Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13669877.2022.2028884 |
| OpenAlex | W4205730720 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 42 |
This paper outlines a theoretical framework for the risk management of road infrastructures from the perspective of organizational studies and engineering science. The framework moves beyond the traditional approach analysing each road infrastructure in isolation, and adopts the emerging systemic approach aimed at optimizing the interrelation between infrastructures, while at the same time extending this approach by considering actors as well as infrastructures. The initial focus is on the interaction between the parts (infrastructure and related actors) within a system (infrastructure and related actors within administrative boundaries) with a focus on two organizational modes: coordination and fragmentation. The choice between coordination and fragmentation depends on the span of safety and the level of risk. Furthermore, coordination and fragmentation offer useful insights for decision-makers by addressing specific modes of governance aimed at avoiding a lack of cooperation and ineffective responses. The paper then examines satellite data obtained from differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar (DInSAR) in a geographical information system (GIS) platform. The aim is to identify the span of safety within a system, concerning specific infrastructures with the related actors, and to assess the risk levels for road infrastructures. The approach is intended to identify the most appropriate organizational mode. The potential of this approach was tested in a sample area of Rome (Italy), and the results reveal a significant span of safety with a common negligible risk, and a subspan of safety with a moderate risk. In the first case, coordination between the parts is desirable. As a result, long-term and fully shared solutions can be adopted, including joint planning operations and standard operating rules. In the second case, fragmentation is indicated, with more flexible solutions characterized by sharing and local autonomy
Business · Corporate governance · Fragmentation (computing · Knowledge management · Process management · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk Governance · Risk management · Computer Science · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations
Integrated infrastructure systems—A review
Challenges for current quantitative risk assessment (QRA) models to describe explicitly the road tunnel safety level
Developments in Seismic Monitoring for Risk Reduction
Toward adaptive decision support for assessing infrastructure system resilience using hidden performance measures
Risk management for infrastructure corridors vulnerable to adjacent land development
Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards
Landslide risk perception survey in Angra dos Reis (Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil)
Risk assessment along the gas pipelines and its application in urban planning
Analysis of territorial compatibility for Seveso-type sites using different risk assessment methods and GIS technique
Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |