Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Technical and organizational challenges in the risk management of road infrastructures

Bibliographic Data

ID12596855
AuthorsRoberta Troisi (0000-0001-6439-2611, University of Salerno), Paolo Castaldo (0000-0002-7956-9392, Politecnico di Torino, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume25
Issue6
Pages791-806
Publication date2022-01-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Risk Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13669877.2022.2028884
OpenAlexW4205730720
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited42

This paper outlines a theoretical framework for the risk management of road infrastructures from the perspective of organizational studies and engineering science. The framework moves beyond the traditional approach analysing each road infrastructure in isolation, and adopts the emerging systemic approach aimed at optimizing the interrelation between infrastructures, while at the same time extending this approach by considering actors as well as infrastructures. The initial focus is on the interaction between the parts (infrastructure and related actors) within a system (infrastructure and related actors within administrative boundaries) with a focus on two organizational modes: coordination and fragmentation. The choice between coordination and fragmentation depends on the span of safety and the level of risk. Furthermore, coordination and fragmentation offer useful insights for decision-makers by addressing specific modes of governance aimed at avoiding a lack of cooperation and ineffective responses. The paper then examines satellite data obtained from differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar (DInSAR) in a geographical information system (GIS) platform. The aim is to identify the span of safety within a system, concerning specific infrastructures with the related actors, and to assess the risk levels for road infrastructures. The approach is intended to identify the most appropriate organizational mode. The potential of this approach was tested in a sample area of Rome (Italy), and the results reveal a significant span of safety with a common negligible risk, and a subspan of safety with a moderate risk. In the first case, coordination between the parts is desirable. As a result, long-term and fully shared solutions can be adopted, including joint planning operations and standard operating rules. In the second case, fragmentation is indicated, with more flexible solutions characterized by sharing and local autonomy

Business · Corporate governance · Fragmentation (computing · Knowledge management · Process management · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk Governance · Risk management · Computer Science · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Underground infrastructure and sustainability

  • An index-based multi-hazard risk assessment method for prioritisation of existing bridge portfolios

    Open Access•Ludovico Alberico Grieco, Nicola Scattarreggia et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2024

  • A framework for understanding and dealing with tensions in risk science

    Open Access•Marja Ylönen, Terje Aven•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations

    Open Access•Sary Faraj, Samer Faraj et al.•Management Science•2006

  • Integrated infrastructure systems—A review

    Open Access•Saeid Saidi, Lina Kattan et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2018

  • Challenges for current quantitative risk assessment (QRA) models to describe explicitly the road tunnel safety level

    Κωνσταντίνος Καζάρας, Konstantinos Kazaras et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2013

  • Developments in Seismic Monitoring for Risk Reduction

    Mehmet Çelebi•Journal of Risk Research•2007

  • Toward adaptive decision support for assessing infrastructure system resilience using hidden performance measures

    Shital Thekdi, Shital A Thekdi et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2018

  • Risk management for infrastructure corridors vulnerable to adjacent land development

    Alexander S Linthicum, James H Lambert•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards

    Alberto Decò, Dan M Frangopol•Journal of Risk Research•2011

  • Landslide risk perception survey in Angra dos Reis (Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil)

    Open Access•Marcos Barreto De Mendonça, Fernanda Teles Gullo•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Risk assessment along the gas pipelines and its application in urban planning

    Open Access•Yafei Zhou, Guangyu Hu et al.•Land Use Policy•2014

  • Analysis of territorial compatibility for Seveso-type sites using different risk assessment methods and GIS technique

    Open Access•Zoltán Török, Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism

    Edward P Thompson•Past & Present•1967

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae