Constructing consumers
Regulatory and methodological consequences of defining consumer preferences in European health claim regulation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12597136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Oliver Todt (0000-0001-9363-0543, Department of Philosophy, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma, Spain, corresponding author), José Luis Luján (0000-0002-8829-0609, Department of Philosophy, University of the Balearic Islands (UIB), Palma, Spain) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1532-1543 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-21 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Risk Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13669877.2021.1873825 |
| OpenAlex | W3121344498 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 24 |
This paper presents an analysis of the underlying assumptions and choices of the European regulatory process for health claims. The latter are scientifically substantiated statements, usually in the form of food labels, regarding the health benefits that a food may confer upon its consumer. We show that the European regulator (the European Food Safety Authority, EFSA) has adopted a particular construction (or definition) of a ‘standard consumer’ of foods with health claims, as well as chosen to give preeminent importance to one particular objective of this regulation (protecting consumers from false claims). EFSA’s choices of standards of proof (establishment of causality between food intake and desired outcome) and scientific methodology (randomized controlled trials) are coherent with this objective and the adopted definition of the consumer. We argue that it is not clear if consumers will react to the regulation as intended by the regulator, due to the possibility that only a fraction of consumers actually correspond to the regulator’s definition of a standard consumer of foods with health claims. We conclude that only empirical research on actual consumer uptake of the EU regulation would allow for an assessment of its effectiveness
Business · Causality (physics · Consumer protection · Consumer safety · Economics · Food choice · Food safety · Health claims on food labels · Law and economics · Precautionary principle · Process (computing · Public economics · Risk analysis (engineering · Agricultural safety and regulations · Computer Science · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Medicine · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Biotechnology · Food Science · Marketing
Evidence-Based Policy
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal
The role of epistemic policies in regulatory science
International legislation on nutrition and health claims
Standards of evidence and causality in regulatory science
Using Metascience to Improve Dose-Response Curves in Biology
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |