Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Transparency and the regulatory process in Europe and the United States

Two research priorities

Bibliographic Data

ID12597345
AuthorsRobert E O’connor (U.S. National Science Foundation, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume19
Issue9
Pages1129-1140
Publication date2015-08-19
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Risk Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13669877.2015.1071866
OpenAlexW2159364335
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited33

Transparency research related to the regulatory process would benefit most from two types of empirical studies. One batch of studies, described in the fifth section of this essay, would focus on the American states and the member states of the European Union to identify the factors that determine whether regulatory processes are more transparent and whether transparency is successful in improving regulations and the regulatory process. In other words, we need comparative state (for the US) and member state (for the EU) studies to develop metrics for the quality of regulations and the role of transparency is advancing or weakening the quality of regulations at the state (for the US) and member state (for the EU) level. The second batch of studies, described in the sixth section of this essay, would explore who uses the information currently provided at the levels of transparency currently available in regulatory processes at the European Union and federal government of the United States. Who benefits from transparency and how are they using the available transparency mechanisms

Business · Corporate governance · Economics · European union · Government (linguistics · International trade · Member state · Member states · Political science · Process (computing · Public economics · Quality (philosophy · Regulatory state · State (computer science · Transparency (behavior · Computer Science · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Accounting · Finance

  • The Evolving Field of Risk Communication

    Open Access•Dominic H P Balog‐Way, Katherine A Mccomas et al.•Risk Analysis•2020

  • Risk Communication for the Future

    Open Access•Mathilde Bourrier, Corinne Bieder•Risk Communication for the Future•2018

  • Unveiling patterns of contestation over Better Regulation reforms in the European Union

    Open Access•Adriana Bunea, Raimondas Ibenskas•Public Administration•2017

  • The politics of sin

    Kenneth J Meier•The politics of sin•1994

  • Politics and markets

    Charles Edward Lindblom•Politics and markets•1977

  • The Fragile Middle Class

    Teresa A Sullivan, Elizabeth Warren et al.•Fragile Middle Class•2017

  • Lobbying and Policy Change

    F R Baumgartner, Jeffrey M Berry et al.•Lobbying and Policy Change•2009

  • Strategies for Promoting Healthier Food Choices

    Julie S Downs, G Loewenstein et al.•American Economic Review•2009

  • Varieties of Transparency

    David Heald•Transparency•2006

  • Political Communication and Deliberation

    John Gastil•Political Communication and…•2008

  • The theory of communicative action

    Open Access•Andrew Edgar•2005

  • The Politics of Precaution

    David Vogel•Politics of Precaution•2012

  • Transparency

    Christopher Hood, David Heald•Transparency•2006

  • Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant

    Open Access•Amitai Etzioni•Journal of Political Philosophy•2010

  • Interest Groups and the Bureaucracy

    John E Chubb•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1984

  • American State Politics

    Open Access•Wallace S Sayre•Political Science Quarterly•1956

  • The Green Agenda in American Politics

    Open Access•David Vogel•Political Science Quarterly•2004

  • Politics, Economics, and the Public

    Open Access•Duane Lockard•Political Science Quarterly•1968

  • Is More Information Better? The Effects of “Report Cards” on Health Care Providers

    David Dranove, Daniel P Kessler et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2003

  • A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy

    Jason Webb Yackee, Susan Webb Yackee•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Does Transparency Improve Governance

    Stephen Kosack, Archon Fung•Annual Review of Political Science•2014

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2017 - 2020 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae