Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conflicting goals and mixed roles in risk regulation

A case study of the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate

Bibliographic Data

ID12598647
AuthorsPreben H Lindøe (University of Stavanger, corresponding author), Odd Einar Olsen (0000-0003-0963-4731, University of Stavanger)
Year2009
Volume12
Issue3-4
Pages427-441
Publication date2009-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Risk Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1366-9877 • E-ISSN: 1466-4461
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13669870902952861
OpenAlexW2086416012
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

This paper discusses the challenge of a regulator being on a position of preventing organisational accidents in high‐technology domains when causes are complex, often poorly understood and with an open or hidden expectation of adding values to society. The purpose of the paper is to assess the combination of mixed roles when a regulator combines the task of facilitating resources management along with controlling the accompanied risks – multiple goals that may be in opposition to each other and mixed roles that may serve opposite interests. The roles and goals of Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD), divided after 30 years of successful operation, are used as a case study. The analysis shows that separating the mixed roles of NPD seems reasonable. However, multiple goals embedded in the resource development create dilemmas facing institutions in the market as well as the regulating authorities in their effort to realise their purpose. That cannot be suspended by a shortcut redesign or new division of labour in ministries, directorates or agencies. The Janus face is a reminder of risks as essential human and social phenomena, being particularly true in sectors and arenas where economic, social and technological risks being at stake

Business · Economics · Human resources · Management · Norwegian · Opposition (politics · Political science · Public relations · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Risk and Safety Analysis

  • Regulating risk for growth

    Open Access•Cormac Bryce, A B King et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • Risk Society

    Ulrich Beck•Risk Society•2013

  • Handbook of qualitative research

    Norman K Denzin, Yvonna S Lincoln•Handbook of qualitative research•1994

  • Understanding Regulation

    Richard Baldwin, Robert Baldwin et al.•Understanding regulation•2011

  • Risk and Blame

    Mary Douglas•Risk and Blame•2002

  • Responsive Regulation

    Ian Ayres, John Braithwaite•Responsive regulation•1992

  • Global Risk Governance

    Open Access•Ortwin Renn, Katherine D Walker•Global Risk Governance•2008

  • Risk management in a dynamic society

    Open Access•Jens Rasmussen•Safety Science•1997

  • Risk and Culture

    Mary Douglas, Aaron Wildavsky•Risk and Culture•2019

  • Public policy and administration in a vulnerable society

    Jan Fredrik Hovden, Jan Hovden•Journal of Risk Research•2004

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

  • Risk society

    Ulrich Beck•Risikogesellschaft•1992

  • From government to governance

    Open Access•Bridget M Hutter, Clive J Jones et al.•Regulation & Governance•2007

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae