Pleasure and meaningful discourse
An overview of research issues
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12601702 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barbara O’connor (Dublin City University, corresponding author), Elisabeth Klaus (0000-0002-6552-5698, Universität Göttingen,) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 369-387 |
| Publication date | 2000-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cultural Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1367-8779 • E-ISSN: 1460-356X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/136787790000300304 |
| OpenAlex | W2142766985 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 33 |
The concept of pleasure has emerged as a multi-faceted social and cultural phenomenon in studies of media audiences since the 1980s. In these studies different forms of pleasure have been identified as explaining audience activity and commitment. In the diverse studies pleasure has emerged as a multi-faceted social and cultural concept that needs to be contextualized carefully. Genre and genre variations, class, gender, (sub-)cultural identity and generation all seem to be instrumental in determining the kind and variety of pleasures experienced in the act of viewing. This body of research has undoubtedly contributed to a better understanding of the complexity of audience activities, but it is exactly the diversity of the concept that is puzzling and poses a challenge to its further use. If pleasure is maintained as a key concept in audience analysis that holds much explanatory power, it needs a stronger theoretical foundation. The article maps the ways in which the concept of pleasure has been used by cultural theorists, who have paved the way for its application in reception analysis, and it goes on to explore the ways in which the concept has been used in empirical studies. Central to our discussion is the division between the ‘public knowledge’ and the ‘popular culture’ projects in reception analysis which, we argue, have major implications for the way in which pleasure has come to be understood as divorced from politics, power and ideology. Finally, we suggest ways of bridging the gap between these two projects in an effort to link pleasure to the concepts of hegemony and ideology
Aesthetics · Ideology · Pleasure · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Law · Media Influence and Health · Psychology · Social and Cultural Dynamics
Looking for fun in Cultural Science
New media – new pleasures
Drug Use and Meanings of Risk and Pleasure
Passion and reason
A very glamorized picture, that”
Food and the class politics of pleasure
Paradox and pleasure
Playing with Sims as a Space of One's Own
Just looking? Choice and constraint in practices of visual consumption at magazine newsstands
Klischee oder Leitbild?
Audience and Reception Research in Retrospect
The Reproduction of Mothering
Media Matters
Reading the Romance
The Audience and Its Landscape
Fernsehaneignung und Alltagsgespräche
Audiences
Fernsehaneignung und Alltagsgespräche
Der Gegensatz von Information ist Desinformation, der Gegensatz von Unterhaltung ist Langeweile
Video Playtime
Situating the Self
Reading the Popular
Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies
News- Values and Fiction- Values
What's the meaning of this? Viewers' plural sense-making of TV news
The aristocracy of culture
The encoding / decoding model
Cultural forms and class mediations
The Politics of Pleasure
Television and Women's Culture
Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema
Applying Fiction Conflict Situations to Analysis of News Stories
The Adoring Audience
The Nationwide Television Studies
Rethinking the Media Audience
Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,45 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |