Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How political is Republicanism? Walking the fine line between moralism and realism

Bibliographic Data

ID12609666
AuthorsDorothea Gädeke (Utrecht University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume25
Issue4
Pages604-615
Publication date2022-03-02
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-8230 • E-ISSN: 1743-8772
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13698230.2022.2042957
OpenAlexW4214846954
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

‘Politics comes first’. This commitment to an approach to normative theorizing that avoids controversial moralistic assumptions lies at the heart of Richard Bellamy’s defence of republican intergovernmentalism. However, a closer analysis of his argument for the primacy of politics reveals a tension in his account: In seeking to avoid a moralist approach, he seems to be torn between a Kantian Republicanism and a Williamsian Realism – while still holding on to some moralist intuitions. I show how this creates ambiguities on each of the three steps of his core argument, the distinction between legitimacy and justice, the defence of non-domination as the standard of legitimacy and the institutional proposal of a republican intergovernmentalism. And I propose to solve them by strengthening the Kantian Republicanism side of his approach, which, or so I will argue, can walk the fine line between moralism and realism. While – on my reading – this Kantian Republicanism already forms the heart of Bellamy’s account, it would require adjusting the realist conceptual framework on which he relies. And so my proposal is meant as an invitation to engage the underlying and intriguing question that Bellamy’s account raises: in what sense and to what extent is republicanism – whether of a Kantian or any other kind – a political political theory

Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · European union · Intergovernmentalism · Legitimacy · Morality · Normative · Political science · Politics · Realism · Sociology · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theory and Influence

  • Neo-Roman Freedom and Private Incarceration in the Modern Republic

    Daniella Mascarenhas•Critical Review•2025

  • A Republican Europe of States

    Open Access•R Bellamy•Republican Europe of States•2019

  • Political Constitutionalism

    Open Access•R Bellamy•Political Constitutionalism•2007

  • On the People's Terms

    Open Access•Philip Pettit•On the People's Terms•2012

  • From Neo-Republicanism to Critical Republicanism

    Dorothea Gädeke•Radical Republicanism•2020

  • A General Theory of Domination and Justice

    Frank Lovett•A General Theory Of Domination•2010

  • A Kantian Republican Conception of Justice as Nondomination

    Rainer Forst•Republican Democracy•2013

  • Towards a Critical Theory of Transnational Justice

    Open Access•Rainer Forst•Metaphilosophy•2001

  • Republicanism

    Philip Pettit•Republicanism•1999

  • Does a Mugger Dominate? Episodic Power and the Structural Dimension of Domination

    Open Access•Dorothea Gädeke•Journal of Political Philosophy•2019

  • The Democratic Minimum

    Open Access•James Bohman•Ethics & International Affairs•2005

  • Between Utopianism and Realism

    Open Access•R Bellamy•Political Studies•2019

  • Which Republicanism, Whose Freedom

    Open Access•R Bellamy•Political Theory•2016

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae