Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The arbitrary circumscription of the jurisdiction of the international criminal court

Bibliographic Data

ID12610069
AuthorsThomas Christiano (0000-0003-1615-4031, University of Arizona, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume23
Issue3
Pages352-370
Publication date2019-01-14
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-8230 • E-ISSN: 1743-8772
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13698230.2019.1565715
OpenAlexW2909531966
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited17

As it is currently legally constituted, the International Criminal Court has no jurisdiction over the world’s most important military powers – United States, China and Russia-for the most serious crimes that can be committed in the international system (unless their members commit the crimes on the territory of a state that has ratified the ICC). It is hard to see the restricted jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court as anything other than the bald placing of the most powerful members of the international political community above the law while the rest of the community remains subject to it. At the same time, one essential element of the legitimacy of the International Criminal Court is that it is founded on state consent. But this does not get the International Criminal Court entirely off the hook. I will argue that the circumscription of the jurisdiction of the court is arbitrary and in violation of fundamental norms of justice and that this threatens the legitimacy of the Court. We are facing a legitimacy dilemma between the need for state participation in the creation of international law and the requirements of the rule of law

International court · International law · Jurisdiction · Legitimacy · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Public international law · Universal jurisdiction · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law

  • You can't tell me what to do! Why should states comply with international institutions

    Open Access•Antoinette Scherz•Journal of Social Philosophy•2023

  • The problem of selective prosecution and the legitimacy of the International Criminal Court

    Open Access•Thomas Christiano•Journal of Social Philosophy•2023

  • Legitimate international authority and institutional diversity

    Antoinette Scherz, Oisin Suttle•Critical Review of International…•2025

  • A Liberal Theory of International Justice

    Andrew Altman, Christopher Heath Wellman•A liberal theory of international…•2009

  • Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law

    Open Access•Mark A Drumbl•Atrocity, Punishment, and…•2007

  • Humanity's Law

    Open Access•Ruti Teitel, Ruti G Teitel•Humanity's law•2011

  • The justice cascade

    Kathryn Sikkink•The justice cascade•2011

  • The Constitution of Equality

    Thomas Christiano•The constitution of equality•2008

  • Justification and Legitimacy

    Open Access•A John Simmons•Justification and Legitimacy•2000

  • Justification and Legitimacy

    A John Simmons•Ethics•1999

  • Rough justice

    Reza Barmaki•Global Crime•2014

  • More Candour about Criteria

    James A Goldston•Journal of International Criminal…•2010

  • The International Criminal Court and the politics of prosecutions

    Open Access•Alana Tiemessen•The International Journal of…•2014

  • Legalism

    Ruth Gavison•History of European Ideas•1987

  • Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity

    Open Access•Hyeran Jo, Beth A Simmons•International Organization•2016

Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae