Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Service Quality in Regulated Network Industries

Bibliographic Data

ID12613726
AuthorsCatherine Waddams Price (0000-0003-1846-5407, University of East Anglia, corresponding author), Bitten BRIGHAM (Loughborough University), Lisa Fitzgerald (0000-0002-0252-2246, Loughborough University), Lin FITZGERALD
Year2008
Volume79
Issue2
Pages197-225
Publication date2008-05-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of Public and Cooperative Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1370-4788 • E-ISSN: 1467-8292
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-8292.2008.00360.x
OpenAlexW2019662016
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited14

Economic regulators provide incentives for good quality of service as well as constraints on the prices or revenue which can be charged by firms with monopoly power. Economic theory suggests that regulators should choose standards according to consumers' valuation and the marginal cost of quality improvements, and that firms respond by equalizing the marginal costs from not making improvements (i.e. the regulatory penalty plus any loss in revenue) with the marginal costs of improvement. This paper explores the evidence for such economically rational behaviour by both regulators and regulatees. We use a specially constructed data set on service quality targets and achievements across the main UK utility sectors; documentary evidence from regulators; and interviews with managers in companies subject to those regulators. We conclude that regulators are motivated by political as well as economic factors. And that companies may not respond primarily to the regulator's financial rewards or penalties for their quality targets, with a consequent danger that regulated consumers pay for marketing in unregulated markets; the resulting level of service quality may be ‘too high’ in the economic sense

Business · Economics · Incentive · Industrial organization · Marginal cost · Marginal revenue · Microeconomics · Monopoly · Public economics · Quality (philosophy · Revenue · Service (business · Service quality · Valuation (finance · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Public Policy and Administration Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Finance · Marketing

  • UK Privatization and Household Welfare

    Paolo Liberati•FinanzArchiv•2005

  • Water utility network loss reduction and service quality under price cap and rate of return regulation

    Open Access•Selvin Thanacoody•Utilities Policy•2024

  • Experiences of modern rate of return regulation in Finland

    Open Access•Kaisa Tahvanainen, Samuli Honkapuro et al.•Utilities Policy•2012

  • Reversing privatization

    Open Access•Ariel A Casarín, Augusto C Mercadier et al.•Utilities Policy•2025

  • Regulatory instruments and investment behaviour

    Open Access•Phil Burns, Christoph Riechmann•Utilities Policy•2004

  • Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses

    Bengt Holmström, Paul Milgrom•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1991

  • A Theory of Yardstick Competition

    Open Access•Andrei Shleifer•The RAND Journal of Economics•1985

  • UK utilities

    Open Access•E Markou, Catherine Waddams Price•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•1999

  • International Procurement as a Signal of Export Quality

    Open Access•David R Collie, Morten Hviid•The Economic Journal•2001

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0.23
Citation span2004 - 2025 (22)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae