Do farmers' professional cooperatives improve agricultural technical efficiency? Evidence using a national‐level dataset of China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12614172 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Menglu Li (0000-0003-2426-0141, College of Management Sichuan Agricultural University Sichuan Chengdu China), Shemei Zhang (College of Management Sichuan Agricultural University Sichuan Chengdu China, corresponding author), Nawab Khan (0000-0002-4605-3875, College of Management Sichuan Agricultural University Sichuan Chengdu China) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 363-383 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1370-4788 • E-ISSN: 1467-8292 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/apce.12437 |
| OpenAlex | W4381510787 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 45 |
This study examines the impact of farmers' professional cooperatives (FPCs) on agricultural technical efficiency (TE), using panel data from 30 provinces of China from 2015 to 2020 and the stochastic frontier function (SFF) method. The number of members of each cooperative, the proportion of demonstration cooperatives, and the proportion of standard cooperatives are introduced as proxy variables for the development level of FPCs. The results show that although the development of FPCs is imperfect, its development has a significant positive impact on improving China's agricultural TE. Through the continuous increase in the number of cooperative members and the vigorous promotion of standardized production, agricultural TE has been significantly improved. However, the construction of model cooperatives has not played a positive role but inhibited the growth of agricultural TE. It is suggested to expand the cooperative membership and promote standardized production. The government and policymakers should focus on improving the standardization level of cooperatives and the development quality of FPCs from the aspects of innovating cooperation models, standardizing internal governance, and giving full play to the synergistic effect of agricultural science and technology
Agricultural economics · Agricultural productivity · Agricultural science · Agriculture · Business · China · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Frontier · Government (linguistics · Microeconomics · Political science · Production (economics · Productivity · Promotion (chess · Proxy (statistics · Quality (philosophy · Standardization · Stochastic frontier analysis · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Cooperative Studies and Economics · Efficiency Analysis Using DEA · Finance
Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data
The Measurement of Productive Efficiency
Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models
Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia
Impact of cooperative membership on production efficiency of smallholder goat farmers in Nepal
Effects of cooperative membership on financial performance of banana farmers in China
Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare
Situation features and governance structure of farmer cooperatives in China
Does internet use improve technical efficiency of banana production in China? Evidence from a selectivity-corrected analysis
The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption
Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels – Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China
Agricultural cooperative membership and technical efficiency of apple farmers in China
Agrifood Industry Transformation and Small Farmers in Developing Countries
Impacts of cooperative membership on rice productivity
An empirical study of land rental development in rural Gansu, China
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |