Coexistence of nonprofit, for‐profit and public sector institutions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12614487 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Femida Handy (0000-0003-3200-8042, York University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 201-223 |
| Publication date | 1997-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1370-4788 • E-ISSN: 1467-8292 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-8292.00043 |
| OpenAlex | W1964487532 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
If nonprofit organizations are superior institutions in resolving informational asymmetry and resulting contract failure, why do nonprofit (NPs), for‐profit (FPs) and government/public institutions (GPs) survive in the same industry? This article explicitly models the nonconvex budget set for the consumer that arises through the juxtaposition of the inefficiencies and contract failures that occur in the three sectors. Because the consumer is willing to trade quality for efficiency and price, varying market shares for NPs, FPs and GPs can exist in the same industry. The theory offered complements the functionalist explanation of the existence of nonprofits advanced by Weisbrod and Hansmann using a micro‐analysis
Business · Economic growth · Economics · Economy · Government (linguistics · Industrial organization · Market failure · Microeconomics · Nonprofit organization · Political science · Private sector · Profit (economics · Public sector · Public Administration · Taxation and Compliance Studies
Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations
Is the Government Failure Theory Still Relevant? A panel analysis using US state level data
Fondements Et Implications De La Diversité Organisationnelle Au Sein Du Commerce Équitable
Explaining Trust in Canadian Charities
Determinants of Nonprofit Sector Density
Understanding Gaps Between Objective and Subjective Performance Measures
Regulatee Choice in Certification Schemes
| Citations per year | 0.3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2003 - 2023 (21) |
| Highly cited | No |