Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How sustainable are the farmer producer companies (FPCs) in India?—Unravelling the determinants of farmers’ perceptions through multivariate analyses

Bibliographic Data

ID12614702
AuthorsShreya Anand (0000-0003-3001-1918, Department of Agricultural Extension, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture) Visva‐Bharati University Sriniketan West Bengal India), Souvik Ghosh (0000-0002-2161-2984, Department of Agricultural Extension, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture) Visva‐Bharati University Sriniketan West Bengal India, corresponding author), Anirvan Mukherjee (0000-0002-6025-3363, ICAR‐Research Complex for Eastern Region Patna Bihar India), Arijit Roy (0000-0001-5581-9257, School of Agricultural Sciences Techno India University Tripura Agartala Tripura India)
Year2025
Publication date2025-09-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of Public and Cooperative Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1370-4788 • E-ISSN: 1467-8292
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/apce.70017
OpenAlexW4414246290
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited56

Agriculture is predominantly driven by smallholder farmers; majority are in Asian countries like China and India. Recognizing the need for commercializing smallholder farms and increasing their revenue, farmer producer companies (FPCs), a subset of farmer producer organizations, have emerged as smallholder farmers’ collectives in India. Present research examined how member‐farmers perceive the sustainability of FPCs and identified key factors influencing it. A random sample of the eight FPCs of varying duration and functions in the eastern Indian state of Bihar, where about 97% of farmers are smallholders, were assessed through an interview schedule survey of 320 member‐farmers in terms of their demographic, economic and socio‐behavioural attributes. Organizational factors, such as functional efficiency, member satisfaction, empowerment and group dynamics of the FPCs, were assessed using Likert‐type scales. Sustainability of the FPCs is indexed based on members’ perceptions on growth, business planning and outlook, management and governance, value and credibility, brand and promotion and collaboration and innovation. Multivariate analyses, including multiple regression and path analysis, revealed that older and more diversified FPCs were perceived as more sustainable, with higher levels of functional efficiency, satisfaction, empowerment and group cohesion. Functional efficiency, member satisfaction and group dynamics had a direct positive impact on sustainability, whereas empowerment and progressive attitudes showed indirect effects. These findings suggest that strengthening internal dynamics and organizational performance of FPCs can enhance their sustainability and make smallholders’ agricultural production system remunerative

Agriculture · China · Empowerment · Path analysis (statistics · Perception · Promotion (chess · Sample (material · Sustainability · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agricultural risk and resilience · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

  • Export‐oriented organic coffee cooperatives’ visions and strategies on sustainability

    Open Access•Aldo Daniel Jiménez-Ortega, Aldo Daniel Jiménez‐Ortega et al.•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2026

  • Techniques of attitude scale construction.

    Allen L Edwards•1957

  • Strategic Management

    Open Access•Ralph E Freeman•Strategic Management•2010

  • Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers

    Open Access•M A Altieri, Fernando R Funes-Monzote et al.•Agronomy for Sustainable…•2012

  • Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems

    C S Holling•Annual Review of Ecology and…•1973

  • A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

    Open Access•Jörg Henseler, Christian M Ringle et al.•Journal of the Academy of…•2015

  • The principles of scientific management

    Open Access•Frederick Winslow Taylor, Frederıck Wınslow Taylor•The principles of scientific…•2024

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • Producer organizations in the last 25 years

    Open Access•Shantanu Bhunia, Piyush Kumar Singh•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy

    Gaël Fain, Joseph Alois Schumpeter et al.•Capitalism, socialism, and…•2010

  • Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science

    Kurt Lewin•Resolving social conflicts•1997

  • Aggregation models and small farm commercialization – A scoping review of the global literature

    Open Access•Mathew Abraham, Leslie Verteramo Chiu et al.•Food Policy•2022

  • Institutional Strengthening of Farmer Producer Organizations and Empowerment of Small Farmers in India

    Open Access•N Lalitha, P K Viswanathan et al.•Millennial Asia•2022

  • Assessing the long-term viability of farmers' collectives in South India

    Open Access•Suresh, Vivek et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2024

  • Farmers’ Cooperatives in the Eu

    Open Access•Jos Bijman, Constantine Iliopoulos•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2014

  • Which type of producer organization is (more) inclusive? Dynamics of farmers’ membership and participation in the decision‐making process

    Open Access•Mercy Mwambi, Jos Bijman et al.•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2020

  • Drivers of Pro-Active Member Participation in Agricultural Cooperatives

    Open Access•Andrei Domingues Cechin, Jos Bijman et al.•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2013

  • (Farmer) Producer Companies in India as new generation cooperatives

    Open Access•Sukhpal Singh•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2023

  • Alternative agrifood systems and the economic sustainability of farmers' cooperatives

    Open Access•Zhanping Hu, Q F Zhang•Sustainable Development•2024

  • Linking small farmers to modern retail through producer organizations – Experiences with producer companies in India

    Open Access•Anika Trebbin•Food Policy•2014

  • Collective action for smallholder market access

    Open Access•Helen Markelova, Ruth Meinzen-Dick et al.•Food Policy•2008

  • Social Capital and the Environment

    Open Access•Jules Pretty, Hugh Ward•World Development•2001

  • The Number, Size, and Distribution of Farms, Smallholder Farms, and Family Farms Worldwide

    Open Access•Sarah K Lowder, Jakob Skoet et al.•World Development•2016

  • Can institutional innovations in agri-marketing channels alleviate distress selling? Evidence from India

    Open Access•Disha Bhanot, Vinish Kathuria et al.•World Development•2020

  • African farmers’ market organizations and global value chains

    Open Access•Clemens Lutz, Getaw Tadesse•Review of Social Economy•2017

  • Farmers' Producer Companies in India

    Open Access•Anika Trebbin, Markus Hassler•Environment and Planning A…•2012

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae