Post-Agreement Negotiations in the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Regime
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12618538 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mordechai Melamud (National Insurance Institute of Israel, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 357-378 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Negotiation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1382-340X • E-ISSN: 1571-8069 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15718069-12341261 |
| OpenAlex | W2054635418 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 8 |
When considering the concept of post-agreement negotiations (PAN), the CTBT presents a particularly interesting case, because of its elusive status caused by the unusually long time lag between the treaty’s adoption in 1996 and its still unattained entry into force. For almost two decades, negotiations on key elements have been ongoing in the Preparatory Commission (PrepCom) in preparation for entry-into-force as required by the treaty. This article explores the challenges of PAN in the framework of the PrepCom and its place in the CTBT regime evolution. Using four factors in regime development – adjustment, maintenance, cybernetics and exogenous factors – the work of the PrepCom concerning verification is analyzed. Technical and political issues are described as examples from the PrepCom’s work since the opening of the CTBT for signature illustrating regime building through post agreement negotiations
Arms control · Commission · Economics · International relations · International trade · Law and economics · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Test (biology · Treaty · Work (physics · Engineering · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear and radioactivity studies · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Geology
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2013 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |