Why Conflicts In The Former Soviet Union Are So Difficult To Negotiate And Mediate
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12618745 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Марина Лебедева (0000-0003-4162-0807, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, corresponding author), Marina M Lebedeva (Moscow State Institute of International Relations) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 409-421 |
| Publication date | 1996-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Negotiation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1382-340X • E-ISSN: 1571-8069 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/157180696x00151 |
| OpenAlex | W2038924659 |
| Language | EN |
The difficulty in using negotiation and mediation to resolve conflicts in the former Soviet Union (FSU) derives from factors coming both from the Soviet and pre-Soviet Russian periods and from the current transition. Traditional reliance on authority and government centralization led to both reliance on and distrust of central authorities, neither of which is conducive to negotiation. In the transition period, rigidity, change, long-term and short-term uncertainty, distrust, and absence of valid spokespeople all contribute to undermine negotiations. Yet, inevitably, more negotiation and mediation will be needed and eventually used
Distrust · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Mediation · Negotiation · Negotiation theory · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Soviet union · European and International Law Studies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|