Multilevel Regimes and Asserting the “Right to Negotiate
” Fitting the Public into Post-Agreement Negotiation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12618800 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bertram I Spector (0000-0002-8048-9568, Center for Negotiation Analysis and Management Systems International600 Water Street SW, Washington, DC 20024USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 419-440 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Negotiation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1382-340X • E-ISSN: 1571-8069 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15718069-12341264 |
| OpenAlex | W2144898990 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 8 |
Emerging changes to post-agreement negotiation structures and actors can have important implications for the process and outcome of negotiated agreements. These innovations include the coexistence of negotiated global and regional regimes on the same policy issue, as well as civil society organizations that assert their “right to negotiate” at the domestic level to promote national compliance with regime standards and provisions. The evolution of these factors within the post-agreement negotiations of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) is used as a case study. Globalization and communications technology trends play a major role in promoting these changes
Business · Civil society · Compliance (psychology · Convention · Globalization · International trade · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |