Epigenesis of the Monstrous Form and Preformistic 'Genetics' (Lémery - Winslow - Haller)

Bibliographic Data

ID12619577
AuthorsMaria Teresa Monti (0000-0001-5295-6299, 1Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Milan, Italy, corresponding author)
Year2000
Volume5
Issue1
Pages3-32
Publication date2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEarly Science and Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1383-7427 • E-ISSN: 1573-3823
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/157338200x00272
PMID11624444
OpenAlexW2028373997
LanguageEN
Citations received3

The present essay analyzes an eighteenth-century phase of the querelle des monstres and highlights two main points. 1) As the cases of Lemery and Winslow demonstrate, in the period when preformation was the dominant view, the dispute over the origin of monsters carried into the very field of preformation the contrast which had originally opposed it to the now defeated model of epigenesis, namely the alternative between mechanical genesis and pre-existence of the monstrous form itself. 2) One of the most important episodes in the shift of teratology from a primarily theological or metaphysical issue to a purely natural one was due to Albrecht von Haller. Haller shifted the dispute from anatomy to embryology, and it is on an embryological base and not on metaphysics that he built his own demonstration of the original nature of the monster. He was furthermore the only scientist of authority who dealt with teratology from an epigenetic standpoint. His numerous changes of view in the field of embryology did in fact never affect his early adherence to the thesis of original monstrosity

Biology · Latin American Literature Analysis · Philosophy · Genetics

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub