A Jumble of Writings
Commentaries on Aristotle’s De Longitudine et Brevitate Vitae Attributed to Adam of Buckfield
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12619654 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tilke Nelis (0000-0003-0371-196X, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-56 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-23 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Early Science and Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1383-7427 • E-ISSN: 1573-3823 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15733823-12340033 |
| OpenAlex | W4220699545 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The translatio vetus of Aristotle’s De longitudine et brevitate vitae – a medieval text also known under the title of De morte et vita – was commented upon by the Oxford Master Adam of Buckfield in the thirteenth century. Inventories record two commentaries, which are either anonymous or unclearly ascribed. These writings are usually attributed by modern scholarship to Buckfield, though not always on convincing grounds. In the present article, I offer a more accurate, expanded overview of some so-called Buckfield commentaries on the translatio vetus , distinguishing between four individual texts. In order to characterize these writings, and to have a solid basis for addressing the authenticity problem, one passage from each commentary is scrutinized within the scope of a case study
Art · Epistemology · Literature · Order (exchange · Scholarship · Scope (computer science · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Classics · Computer Science · History · Law · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |