Consumption of information and citizen’s perception of the sources consulted during the Covid-19 pandemic
A study of the situation based on opinion polls
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12623006 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alberto Quian (0000-0002-8593-7999, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, corresponding author), Carlos Elías Pérez (0000-0002-1330-4324, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid), Xosé Soengas Pérez (0000-0003-3246-0477, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | El Profesional de la Informacion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-6710 • E-ISSN: 1699-2407 |
| Publisher | Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3145/epi.2023.jul.13 |
| OpenAlex | W4385305430 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 46 |
The aim of this cross-sectional study is to analyze the consumption of information about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Spain and to ascertain the public’s perception of the role of journalists, the media, the scientific community, and governmental and health authorities. The methodology involved taking a descriptive survey of a sample of 1,800 people who were representative of the Spanish population, were of legal age, and were residents of the 17 autonomous communities, between June 6 and 22, 2022. Age, political leaning, attitude toward vaccines, and level of education were determining variables. The results show that ideology and age are the factors that most condition the use of different types of information sources. Centrists consume more traditional media than those on the political left or right, who are the least likely to obtain their information from traditional media. And left-wingers rely more on official sources, such as health authorities, in contrast to centrists or right-wingers. Anti-vaccinationists (anti-vaxxers) prefer alternative sources. Meanwhile, the use of sources does not differ between men and women. Their consumption behavior is similar, which shows that gender is not a variable that significantly influences information consumption, neither in the selection of sources nor in the perception of the role of science and journalism. In general, the main sources of information consulted during the COVID-19 pandemic were the traditional media and the health authorities. In the context of the pandemic, young people consumed the least information and expressed the greatest distrust in journalism and science
Consumption (sociology · Context (archaeology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Disease · Distrust · Geography · Ideology · Information source (mathematics · Journalism · Mass media · Media consumption · News media · Pandemic · Perception · Political science · Politics · Population · Public opinion · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Communication and COVID-19 Impact · Demography · Law · Media Influence and Health · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology
How to Fight an Infodemic
The resilience of the Spanish health system against the Covid-19 pandemic
Covid-19
Coronavirus
The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of Covid-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape
Infodemiology
Percepciones de la ciudadanía española ante la desinformación en tiempos de la Covid-19
How Politicians’ Attacks on Science Communication Influence Public Perceptions of Journalists and Scientists
Coronavirus in Spain
Motivated Rejection of Science
Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures
Fighting Covid-19 Misinformation on Social Media
Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population
Nasa Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax
Vaccine Hesitancy in the Age of Coronavirus and Fake News
Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to Covid-19 epidemics
Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere
How People Weave Online Information Into Pseudoknowledge
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |