Evolución del concepto de usabilidad como indicador de calidad del software
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12623995 |
|---|---|
| Authors | José Luís González Sanchez (0000-0002-0777-8427, corresponding author), José-Luis González-Sánchez, Francisco Montero (0000-0002-0902-9681, Universitat de Lleida), Francisco Montero-Simarro, Francisco Luís Gutiérrez Vela (0000-0001-6629-7597, Universidad de Granada), Francisco-Luis Gutiérrez-Vela |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 529-536 |
| Publication date | 2012-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | El Profesional de la Informacion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-6710 • E-ISSN: 1699-2407 |
| Publisher | Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3145/epi.2012.sep.13 |
| OpenAlex | W2017895886 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 9 |
Technological advances in the field of information and interactive systems mean that increasing numbers of factors and criteria are considered to assess quality during the design, development and evaluation process. In this context, concepts such as quality of use and user experience have appeared and in many cases are replacing or supplementing existing usability properties to identify the quality of the interaction process. In this paper we describe and analyze the evolution of the different concepts to identify the quality of the interaction on information systems and we help to characterize and locate each quality factor in one dimension and a specific range of the process of use, and consider the relationships and overlap between these concepts
Context (archaeology · Dimension (graph theory · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Geography · Human–computer interaction · Knowledge management · Process (computing · Quality (philosophy · Usability · Computer Science · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Mathematics · Usability and User Interface Design
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2022 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |