Evaluación de la ciencia
Tan necesaria como problemática
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12625015 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lluís Codina (0000-0001-7020-1631, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 715-715 |
| Publication date | 2016-10-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | El Profesional de la Informacion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-6710 • E-ISSN: 1699-2407 |
| Publisher | Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3145/epi.2016.sep.01 |
| OpenAlex | W2531555769 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 2 |
No one disputes the need for science to be evaluated, but the evaluation is a source of continued controversy. The characteristics of major evaluations that have been carried out in the scientific research environment are presented in this article, including evaluations of articles under peer review, and evaluations of personal trajectories. The main problems and challenges along with possible solutions are discussed
Economics · Political science · Sociology · Welfare economics · Psychology · Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2021 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |