"Feminism, Capitalism, and Nancy Fraser’s "Terrain of Battle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12628113 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lillian Cicerchia (0000-0002-7377-0423, corresponding author), Philosophy Documentation Center |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 153-175 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Radical Philosophy Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1388-4441 • E-ISSN: 1569-1659 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/radphilrev20184986 |
| OpenAlex | W2797874590 |
| Language | EN |
In this paper I argue that Nancy Fraser’s theory of social reproduction is misleading and that the process of exploitation is more central to women’s oppression than Fraser’s theory suggests. I argue that Fraser’s theory of women’s oppression is continuous with her theory of capitalism and political agency. I critique Fraser’s theory of capitalism at a structural level to clarify some of the ambiguity in her position about the difference between production and reproduction. I then compare Fraser’s view with a structural view of class to make my critique and extend it to her theoretical distinction between status and class
Agency (philosophy · Ambiguity · Capitalism · Class (philosophy · Epistemology · Feminism · Oppression · Political science · Politics · Reproduction · Social science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|