What ‘counts’ in international forest policy research? A conference ethnography of valuation practice and habitus in an interdisciplinary social science field
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12629338 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Susanne Koch (0000-0002-6830-9077, Technical University of Munich, corresponding author), Camilla Tetley (0009-0003-6821-0792, Technical University of Munich) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 154 |
| Pages | 103034-103034 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Forest Policy and Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1389-9341 • E-ISSN: 1872-7050 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103034 |
| OpenAlex | W4385142969 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 25 |
In this paper, we examine implicit values, norms and orientations that guide international forest policy research (FPR). We link Bourdieu's praxeological theory and valuography to empirically grasp disciplinary habitus manifesting in valuation practice at International Forest Policy Meetings. Conferences provide spaces where scholars negotiate ‘what counts’. In presenting and discussing research, they enact values of ‘good’ scholarship that reflect basic orientations of doing science in the field. Based on conference ethnography and reflexive interviews with participants, we identify two dispositions characterising dominant habitus in FPR: an objectivistic understanding of scientificity, and an affective orientation towards forest practice. They reflect in the set of values enacted, including methodical rigour, representativeness, innovativeness, responsiveness and usability/applicability, along with an attachment to forests as shared and connective subject of concern. We explain the prevalence of these values through field-habitus theory with the socio-historical conditions from which FPR in the Global North emerged. Accounts of its history emphasise the emancipation from scientific forestry, and its distinctive identity as a forest-focused field encompassing a wide range of social sciences. However, our findings suggest that FPR has not yet achieved full autonomy, as the value characteristics of ‘good’ science are still aligned with those of the ‘mother disciplines’ and oriented at expectations of external actors. FPR has not yet developed a regime of valuation that does justice to its interdisciplinarity, which prevents the field from utilising its full potential. Prevailing habitus lowers the relevance of normative scholarship that expresses more radical or transformative visions challenging orthodox paradigms. It entrenches an inequality between different strands of research within the field, without anyone intending this. Our study gives input for reflecting values, norms and orientations underlying FPR, and seeks to inform the on-going discourse on its nature, purpose and future in science and society
Cultural capital · Economics · Epistemology · Habitus · Normative · Political science · Reflexivity · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · Valuation (finance · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Do universities support solutions-oriented collaborative research? Constraints to wicked problems scholarship in higher education
Making Microplastics Matter
Becoming a forester. Exploring forest management students' habitus in the making
Building connections
All that Matters are Forests and Seas? Practising Relevance in Interdisciplinary Environment-Focused Social Science Fields
Research trends in forest policy in Europe and beyond
Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine
Invisible borders in educational technology research? A comparative analysis
Are evaluative cultures national or global? A cross-national study on evaluative cultures in academic recruitment processes in Europe
How norms, needs, and power in science obstruct transformations towards sustainability
Navigating the science-policy interface
Forests policy analysis and theory use
Forest Policy Analysis
Political theory in forest policy science
The role of science in forest policy–Experiences by EFI
Identifying enabling factors of science-policy interaction in a developing country context
Improving communication across the forest science/policy interface
The peculiar history of scientific reason
Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research
Re-invent Yourself! How Demands for Innovativeness Reshape Epistemic Practices
Co-existing Notions of Research Quality
Sociologists and their work
The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason
Vive la crise
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |