Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cognitive and demographic drivers of attitudes toward using genetic engineering to restore American chestnut trees

Bibliographic Data

ID12630360
AuthorsJoshua D Petit (Oregon State University), Mark D Needham (0000-0001-6265-3371, Oregon State University, corresponding author), Glenn T Howe (0000-0003-4128-2326, Oregon State University)
Year2021
Volume125
Pages102385-102385
Publication date2021-02-05
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueForest Policy and Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1389-9341 • E-ISSN: 1872-7050
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102385
OpenAlexW3128612485
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited42

Biology · Biology and political orientation · Botany · Business · Chestnut blight · Political science · Politics · Sample (material · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Forest Insect Ecology and Management · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Mathematics · Plant and Fungal Interactions Research · Psychology · Marketing

  • Effects of Message Framing on Public Responses to Using Genetic Engineering to Restore American Chestnut Trees

    Joshua D Petit, Mark D Needham et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2021

  • Assessing Perceptions of Genetically Improved Tree Species Among Family Forest Owners (FFO) in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin

    Zoē Ketola, Chelsea Schelly et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2024

  • Public Cognitions and Emotions Associated with Sea Star Wasting Disease

    Maia L Insinga, Mark D Needham et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2022

  • Understanding young people’s perception toward forestation as a strategy to mitigate climate change in a post-conflict developing country

    Open Access•Osman M Jama, Abdishakur W Diriye et al.•Environment Development and…•2023

  • Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication

    Open Access•Karen Bayne, Karen M Bayne et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2024

  • The Construction of Preference

    Open Access•Sarah Lichtenstein, Paul Slovic•Construction of Preference•2006

  • Who Does the Public Trust? The Case of Genetically Modified Food in the United States

    Open Access•John T Lang, William K Hallman•Risk Analysis•2005

  • Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Ivo A Van Der Lans et al.•Trends in Food Science & Technology•2013

  • Values, Perceived Risks and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy

    Open Access•Judith I M De Groot, Linda Steg et al.•Risk Analysis•2013

  • Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States

    Open Access•E Scott, Sydney E Scott et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2016

  • The New Environmental Paradigm Scale

    Riley E Dunlap•The Journal of Environmental…•2008

  • Socioeconomic Determinants of Health‐ and Food Safety‐Related Risk Perceptions

    Open Access•Donna Dosman, Donna M Dosman et al.•Risk Analysis•2001

  • Expert and Public Perception of Risk from Biotechnology

    Open Access•Lucia Savadori, Stefania Savio et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, George Cvetkovich et al.•Risk Analysis•2000

  • The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Risk Analysis•2000

  • Surprisingly malleable public preferences for climate adaptation in forests

    Open Access•Kieran Findlater, Guillaume Peterson St‐Laurent et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Risk Sensitivity and Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease Risk and Other Hunting, Wildlife, and Health Risks

    Mark D Needham, Jerry J Vaske et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2017

  • Exploring public perceptions of solutions to tree diseases in the UK

    Open Access•Paul Jepson, Irina Arakelyan•Environmental Science & Policy•2017

  • Developing publicly acceptable tree health policy

    Open Access•Paul Jepson, Paul R Jepson et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • Exploring public perceptions of forest adaptation strategies in Western Canada

    Open Access•Reem Hajjar, Robert A Kozak et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • When Less is More

    Robyn S Wilson, Joseph Arvai et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2005

  • A Value-Attitude-Behavior Model Predicting Wildland Preservation Voting Intentions

    Maureen P Donnelly Jerry J Vaske•Society & Natural Resources•1999

  • The End of the (Research) World As We Know It? Understanding and Coping With Declining Response Rates to Mail Surveys

    Richard C Stedman, Nancy A Connelly et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2019

  • Hunter Perceptions of Similarity and Trust in Wildlife Agencies and Personal Risk Associated with Chronic Wasting Disease

    Mark D Needham, Jerry J Vaske•Society & Natural Resources•2008

  • Specificity and the Cognitive Hierarchy

    Doug Whittaker, Jerry J Vaske et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2006

  • Coastal Resident Trust, Similarity, Attitudes, and Intentions Regarding New Marine Reserves in Oregon

    E E Perry, Mark D Needham et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2016

  • The Multidimensionality of Trust

    Open Access•Mark J Stern, Kim Coleman et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2014

  • Multiple aspects of unnaturalness

    Open Access•Henrik Mielby, Peter Sandøe et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2013

  • Factors Influencing People’s Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Melanie Connor, Michael Siegrist•Science Communication•2010

  • How Natural Is “More Natural”? The Role of Method, Type of Transfer, and Familiarity for Public Perceptions of Cisgenic and Transgenic Modification

    Open Access•Nicole Kronberger, Wolfgang Wagner et al.•Science Communication•2014

  • The construction of preference

    Paul Slovic•American Psychologist•1995

Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2024 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae