Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

All that glitters is not gold; Power and participation in processes and structures of implementing Redd+ in Kondoa, Tanzania

Bibliographic Data

ID12631772
AuthorsMary Nantongo (0000-0003-0137-6248, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, corresponding author), Arild Vatn (0000-0002-9092-8712, Norwegian University of Life Sciences), Paul Vedeld (Norwegian University of Life Sciences)
Year2018
Volume100
Pages44-54
Publication date2018-11-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueForest Policy and Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1389-9341 • E-ISSN: 1872-7050
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.011
OpenAlexW2901922298
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited58

Business · Carbon stock · Climate change · Community participation · Control (management · Corporate governance · Deforestation (computer science · Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Local community · Local governance · Management · Political science · Power (physics · Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation · Socioeconomics · Tanzania · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Law · Mining and Resource Management · Water Governance and Infrastructure

  • Rethinking Power and Forestry Governance in Colonial and Post-Colonial Tanzania

    Danstan Mukono•The African Review•2022

  • Stakeholders' analysis for supporting sustainable natural gas development in mainland Tanzania

    Open Access•Zainabu Shabani Bungwa, Pius Z Yanda et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Power in forest management institutions

    Open Access•Shambhu Charmakar, Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi et al.•Trees Forests and People•2024

  • Redd+ and Gender Inequality

    Aklilu Bekele, Engdawork Assefa•Case Studies in the Environment•2025

  • Do deforestation reduction policies meet the needs for environmental justice in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

    Open Access•Eliezer Majambu, Moïse Tsayem Demaze et al.•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2026

  • Socio-Economic and Political Determinants of Institutional Bricolage in Forest Resource Appropriation

    Open Access•Shambhu Charmakar, Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2026

  • Benefit sharing and conflict transformation

    Open Access•I Soliev, Insa Theesfeld et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • Can Redd+ projects deliver livelihood benefits in private tenure arrangements? Experiences from rural Zambia

    Open Access•Simon Manda, Nyambe Mukanda•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • The political rationalities of governing deforestation in Colombia

    Open Access•Darío Gerardo Zambrano-Cortés, Jelle Behagel et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • Conflicts in mangrove protected areas through the actor-centred power framework - Insights from China

    Open Access•Weiye Wang, Daye Zhai et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • Redd+ policy implementation and institutional interplay

    Open Access•Josiane Gakou‐Kakeu, Josiane Gakou-Kakeu et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • Fight or Flight? Understanding Different Stakeholder Responses to Conservation Conflicts

    Open Access•Isla D Hodgson, A Fischer et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2022

  • Redd

    Open Access•Mary Nantongo, Arild Vatn et al.•World Development•2023

  • An institutional analysis of ‘power within’ local governance

    Open Access•Muhammad Salman Khan, Stephen Syrett•World Development•2022

  • The invisible commodity

    Open Access•Wendy B Miles, Wendy Miles•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2021

  • Community Participation in Mahikeng Local Municipality

    Open Access•Mandla Mfundo Masuku, Mokgadi Patience Molope et al.•Journal of Asian and African…•2020

  • Village republics

    Robert Wade•Village republics•1988

  • Rich Forests, Poor PeopleResource Control and Resistance in Java

    Nancy Lee Peluso•Rich Forests, Poor People•1992

  • Rich Forests, Poor People

    Nancy Lee Peluso•Rich Forests, Poor People•1992

  • Does Redd+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest Governance?

    Open Access•John Phelps, Jacob Phelps et al.•Science•2010

  • Community power and political theory

    Nelson W Polsby•Community power and political…•1980

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•2015

  • Reducing Redd risks

    Open Access•Jesse Ribot, Allan Larson et al.•International Journal of the…•2012

  • Village politics

    Trond Vedeld•The Journal of Development Studies•2000

  • Institutions and collective action

    Bhim Adhikari, Jon C Lovett•The Journal of Development Studies•2006

  • On Democracy

    Open Access•Robert A Dahl•On Democracy•2020

  • Conservation With a Human Face? Comparing Local Participation and Benefit Sharing From a National Park and a State Forest Plantation in Tanzania

    Open Access•Sayuni B Mariki•SAGE Open•2013

  • Social safeguards and co-benefits in Redd

    Open Access•Ashwini Chhatre, Shikha Lakhanpal et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2012

  • Exploring participation in new forms of environmental governance

    Open Access•Mariel Aguilar-Støen•Environment Development and…•2015

  • Austere Conservation

    Open Access•Jevgeniy Bluwstein, Francis Moyo et al.•Conservation and Society•2016

  • Redd+, transparency, participation and resource rights

    Open Access•Rosemary Lyster•Environmental Science & Policy•2010

  • Nesting local forestry initiatives

    Open Access•T Hayes, Lauren Persha•Forest Policy and Economics•2010

  • Paradoxes of participation

    Open Access•Jens Friis Lund•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • The politics of expertise in participatory forestry

    Open Access•Kathryn E Green, Jens Friis Lund•Forest Policy and Economics•2014

  • Powerful stakeholders as drivers of community forestry — Results of an international study

    Open Access•Carsten Schusser, Max Krott et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • Rethinking ‘expert’ knowledge in community forest management in Tanzania

    Open Access•Andreas Scheba, Irmeli Mustalahti•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • Actor-centred power

    Open Access•Max Krott, Axel Bader et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2013

  • What does it take to institute Redd +? An analysis of the Kilosa Redd + pilot, Tanzania

    Open Access•Arild Vatn, G C Kajembe et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • The Redd menace

    Open Access•Betsy A Beymer-Farris, Thomas J Bassett•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Where and How Can Participatory Forest Management Succeed? Learning From Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos

    Irmeli Mustalahti, Jens Friis Lund•Society & Natural Resources•2009

  • Exploring Climate Justice for Forest Communities Engaging in Redd

    Anna Bolin, Dominic Taku Tassa•Forum for Development Studies•2012

  • Promising Change, Delivering Continuity

    Open Access•Jens Friis Lund, Eliezeri Sungusia et al.•World Development•2016

  • Redd+ and Empowered Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Irmeli Mustalahti, O Sarobidy Rakotonarivo•World Development•2014

  • Finding the Spaces for Change

    Open Access•J Gaventa•IDS Bulletin•2006

  • Soil conservation in Kondoa district, Tanzania

    Open Access•A S M Mgeni•Land Use Policy•1985

  • Absolute and relative power gains among state agencies in forest-related land use politics

    Open Access•Agung Wibowo, Lukas Giessen•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Participatory development and empowerment

    Giles Mohan, Kristian Stokke•Third World Quarterly•2000

  • Between Resistance and Consent

    Grete Benjaminsen•Forum for Development Studies•2014

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

  • Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture

    Open Access•Jules Pretty, Jules N Pretty•World Development•1995

  • Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action

    Open Access•Amy R Poteete, Elinor Ostrom et al.•Development and Change•2004

  • Evaluating Safeguards in a Conservation Incentive Program

    Open Access•Torsten Krause, Wain Collen et al.•Conservation Ecology•2013

  • Depoliticising development

    Sarah C White•Development in Practice•1996

  • Redd+ policy networks

    Open Access•Maria Brockhaus, Monica Di Gregorio et al.•Conservation Ecology•2014

  • Illusions of empowerment? Questioning policy and practice of community forestry in Kenya

    Open Access•Susan W Chomba, Susan Chomba et al.•Conservation Ecology•2015

  • Rethinking Power and Authority

    Open Access•Andrea J Nightingale, Hemant R Ojha et al.•Development and Change•2013

  • Two Faces of Power

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1962

  • Decisions and Nondecisions

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Environmentality

    Arun Agrawal•Current Anthropology•2005

  • Land use plans in Tanzania

    William John Walwa•Journal of Eastern African Studies•2017

  • Redd+ as 'inclusive' neoliberal conservation

    Andreas Scheba, Suraya Scheba•Journal of Eastern African Studies•2017

  • Nothing succeeds like success narratives

    Hanne Svarstad, Tor A Benjaminsen•Journal of Eastern African Studies•2017

Unique citing works16
Citations per year2.67
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae