Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

John Maynard Smith’s typology of animal signals

A view from semiotics

Bibliographic Data

ID12636612
AuthorsTimo Maran (University of Tartu, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume37
Issue3/4
Pages477-497
Publication date2009-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSign Systems Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1406-4243 • E-ISSN: 1736-7409
PublisherUniversity of Tartu (PUBLISHER • EE)
DOI10.12697/sss.2009.37.3-4.05
OpenAlexW2472530991
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited7

Approaches to animal communication have for the most part been quite different in semiotics and evolutionary biology. In this context the writings of a leading evolutionary biologist who has also been attracted to semiotics — John Maynard Smith — are an interesting exception and object of study. The present article focuses on the use and adaptation of semiotic terminology in Maynard Smith’s works with reference to general theoretical premises both in semiotics and evolutionary biology. In developing a typology of animal signals, Maynard Smith employs the concepts of icon, index and symbol to denote distinct signal classes. He uses “indices” or “indexes” to express a signal type where the relation between signal properties and meaning is restricted because of physical characteristics. Such approach also points out the issue of the motivatedness of signs, which has had a long history in semiotics. In the final part of the article the usage and content of the concepts of signal form and meaning in Maynard Smith’s writings are analysed. It appears that in evolutionary biology, the “signal” is a vagueconcept that may denote a variety of things from an animal’s specific physiological status to artificial theoretical constructs. It also becomes evident that in actual usage the concept of signal often includes references to the receiver’s activity and interpretation, which belong rather to the characteristics of sign process. The positive influence of Maynard Smith’s works on semiotics could lie in paying attention to the role of physical necessities in animal communication. Physical constraints and relations also seem to have a significant role in semiotic processes although this is not always sufficiently studied or understood in semiotics

Biology · Cognitive science · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Icon · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Semiotics · Semiotics of culture · Sign (mathematics · Sociology · Symbol (formal · Terminology · Typology · Anthropology · Computer Science · Language and cultural evolution · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Mathematics · Origins and Evolution of Life · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Fifty volumes of Sign Systems Studies

    Open Access•Kalevi Kull, Ott Puumeister•Sign Systems Studies•2022

  • The costs of religious 'cheap talk

    Brandon Daniel-Hughes•Religion•2021

  • A Theory of Semiotics

    Open Access•Umberto Eco•A Theory of Semiotics•1976

  • Metaphors We Live By

    George Lakoff, Mark Johnson et al.•Metaphors we live by•2003

  • Information, Arbitrariness, and Selection

    Open Access•Peter Godfrey-Smith, Peter Godfrey‐smith•Philosophy of Science•2000

  • The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness

    Open Access•Susan K Mills, John Beatty et al.•Philosophy of Science•1979

  • The Confusions of Fitness

    André Ariew, Richard C Lewontin•The British Journal for the…•2004

  • Biosemiotics in the twentieth century

    Open Access•Kalevi Kull•Semiotica•1999

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,4
Citation span2021 - 2022 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae