Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Giorgio Agamben’s Critique of the Covid-19 Response has Little to Do with Biopolitics

Bibliographic Data

ID12643152
AuthorsSara Lindholm (0000-0002-1353-3063, Political Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume25
Issue3
Pages199-212
Publication date2024-07-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Horizons (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1440-9917 • E-ISSN: 1568-5160
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14409917.2024.2390334
OpenAlexW4401805103
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

Giorgio Agamben claims that the aggressive coronavirus response in Italy turned the nation’s entire population into formless bare life, which was cast out from meaningful human existence through a sovereign exception. This widely criticised argument appears to stem from Agamben’s radical reinterpretation of biopolitics, a concept popularised by Michel Foucault. Although Agamben is often considered as the second most famous authority on the topic, some have begun to question whether his reinterpretation can operate within the framework set by his predecessor who defines the notion primarily through its life affirming and optimising effects. This has led to an unclear and contested definition of biopolitics, which hinders the notion’s usage as an analytical tool. Agamben’s statements on the pandemic must face similar scrutiny. According to him, life was not optimised during the pandemic. Therefore, Agamben’s critique on the coronavirus response has little to do with the Foucauldian notion of biopolitics, which offers a much sounder way of analysing the Covid crisis

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Biology · Biopower · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Sociology · State of exception · Law · Medical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies · Medicine · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Virology

  • Health inequalities and biopolitical state racism in the Covid-19 Era

    Open Access•Anaelle Giraux-Arcella•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2026

  • Potentiality and its Discontents

    Open Access•Naveh Frumer•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2025

  • Spread and dynamics of the Covid-19 epidemic in Italy

    Open Access•Marino Gatto, Enrico Bertuzzo et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Biopolitics and the Coronavirus

    Open Access•Lukas Van Den Berge•Netherlands Journal of Legal…•2020

  • Homo Sacer

    Giorgio Agamben•Homo Sacer•2020

  • A Farewell to Homo Sacer? Sovereign Power and Bare Life in Agamben’s Coronavirus Commentary

    Open Access•Sergei Prozorov•Law and Critique•2021

  • Impossible Dialogue on Bio-power

    Open Access•Mika Ojakangas•Foucault Studies•2005

  • Security, Territory, Population

    Open Access•Arnold I Davidson, Graham Burchell et al.•Security, Territory, Population•2009

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae