Autonomy, Reflexivity, Tragedy
Notions of Democracy in Camus and Castoriadis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12643327 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matt Sharpe (0000-0002-8165-5775, Dept. of PhilosophyThe University of Melbourne, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 103-129 |
| Publication date | 2002-02-18 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Horizons (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1440-9917 • E-ISSN: 1568-5160 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1163/156851602760226805 |
| OpenAlex | W2064215279 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
This paper looks at two 20th century theories of tragedy: those of Cornelius Castoriadis and Albert Camus. The theories that each proffer of this ancient cultural form are striking. Against more standard views, both theorists stress that tragedy is a cultural form that has only arisen historically in cultures whose forms of religious thought have been laid open to question. In this way, both argue that tragedy is an important democratic cultural form, which stages the confrontation between a no longer unquestionable divine order, and human autonomy. The intent of the paper, from the start, is a political one. It wants to place Camus alongside Castoriadis as a ‘post-Marxist’ thinker, who belongs meaningfully to what Dick Howard has called ‘the Marxian legacy’. More than this, it aims to do this by staging Camus' theorisation of tragedy, with Castoriadis', as a powerful riposte to the conservative criticism of democracy as a modern political form, that is, that it cannot muster sacral cultural forms forceful enough to meaningfully unite people beneath its banner
Aesthetics · Art · Autonomy · Criticism · Democracy · Epistemology · Greek tragedy · Literature · Marxist philosophy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Tragedy (event · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2010 - 2025 (16) |
| Highly cited | No |