Handle with care; considerations of Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12645617 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lee Hole (0009-0009-3733-7479, University of Bath, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 371-383 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1443-9883 • E-ISSN: 1448-0980 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/qrj-08-2023-0132 |
| OpenAlex | W4388834992 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 16 |
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to support potential users of thematic analysis (as outlined by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke). Researchers with the intention of applying thematic analysis are advised to consider the theoretical framework of their work and how differing ontological and epistemological standpoints influences their approach to thematic analysis. Design/methodology/approach This paper considers aspects of the work that has been done around thematic analysis to guide future potential users. The flexibility, recipe-like use and ease of thematic analysis are discussed, along with guidance being offered to avoid the seemingly common trip hazards of navigating the approach. Findings Users of thematic analysis seemingly continue to cite Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis whilst repeatedly contradicting the guidance of their work. Practical implications Readers of this paper that intend on using thematic analysis will be redirect to further learning, personal reflection and adjustments to the way in which they engage with, utilise and report their qualitative work using Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic analysis. Social implications It is possible that past research that has been reported as using Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic analysis has been misinterpreted, misunderstood and misused. This as a result of researchers potentially having failed to embrace the need to engage in reflexive, epistemological and ontologically clear processes during the use of thematic analysis. Originality/value While Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic analysis seems to have developed a significant level of popularity and use, the finer but impactful understanding of the approach has been overlooked. Other work has been done in relation to thematic analysis but there has not been anything to support thinking and learning around the suitable, accurate and knowledgeable use of the approach
Epistemology · Flexibility (engineering · Management · Management science · Originality · Popularity · Qualitative research · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Thematic map · Thematic structure · Value (mathematics · Work (physics · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Philosophy · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Psychology
Is there a place for restorative justice in forensic mental health hospitals in the United Kingdom? A qualitative study
Newly Graduated Nurses at Work
Hermeneutic Thematic Analysis
Negotiating meaning in Tolaki Qur'an translation
Helping early childhood educators thrive
Thematic analysis of qualitative data
Extended basic education programme for newly arrived migrant students in Norway
Lived Theology and Leadership in Wartime Ukraine
Thematic Analysis in an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Context
The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods
Developing a Method of Critical Thematic Analysis for Qualitative Communication Inquiry
Qualitative research and its place in psychological science.
Developing rigor in qualitative research
Thematic analysis
“I don't have much of a choice”
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
A starting point for your journey, not a map’
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis
Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Thematic Analysis
Making Sense of S&M
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |